Innovation in Higher Education: The Influence of Classroom Design and Instructional Technology

Christine Siegel*, Jennifer Claydon**
* Vice Provost and Associate Vice President, Academic Affairs, Fairfield University, Connecticut, USA.
** Accreditation Coordinator, Fairfield University, Connecticut, USA.
Periodicity:September - November'2016
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.12.2.8216

Abstract

The current work seeks to explore University professors' perspectives on teaching and learning in an innovative classroom characterized by flexible design of space, furniture and technology. The study took place during the 2015-2016 academic year at Fairfield University, a Masters comprehensive university in the Northeastern United States. Qualitative research methods for data collection and analysis were used to gather and summarize professors' perspectives, with specific attention to their integration of technology for instruction and use of teaching strategies. Emergent themes revealed that professors redesigned course work and class time to utilize the innovative technology and space effectively. Results further demonstrated that professors actively integrated multiple types of technology into classroom instruction and used a variety of pedagogies to engage students. Additionally, professors expressed increased satisfaction and motivation for teaching related to ease of instructional technology and flexibility of classroom furniture. Future research is needed to examine how such changes in instructor perspectives might influence paradigm shifts in higher education and impact college student learning.

Keywords

Classroom Design, Instructional Technology, Active Learning, Innovative Pedagogy, Higher Education.

How to Cite this Article?

Siegel, C., and Claydon, J. (2016). Innovation in Higher Education: The Influence of Classroom Design and Instructional Technology. i-manager's Journal on School Educational Technology, 12(2), 24-33. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.12.2.8216

References

[1]. Ananaidou, K., and Claro, (2009). “21 Century Skills and Competences for New Millennium Learners in OECD Countries”. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 41, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/218525261154
[2]. Beeland, W.D. (2002). “Student Engagement, Visual Learning and Technology: Can Interactive Whiteboards Help?” Retrieved from http://chiron.valdasta.edu/are/ Artmanscript/vol11no1/beeland_am.pdf
[3]. Berrett, D. (2012). “How 'flipping' the Classroom can Improve the Traditional Lecture”. The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://ctl.ok.ubc.ca/__shared/ assets/_Flipping__The_Classroom45753.pdf
[4]. Bonwell, C.C., and Eison, J.A. (1991). “Active learning & creating excitement in the classroom (ASHE-ERIC)”. Higher Education Reports, (1), The George Washington University School of Education & Human Development.
[5]. Boyd, D. (2016). “What would Paulo Freire Think of Blackboard TM: Critical Pedagogy in an Age of Online Learning”. International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 165-186.
[6]. Bruner, J. (1973). Beyond the Information Given: Studies in the Psychology of Learning. WW Norton & Company.
[7]. Bruner, J. (1996). The Culture of Education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[8]. Byrnes, J. (2001). Minds, Brains and Learning: Understanding the Psychological and Educational Relevance of Neuroscientific Research. New York, NY: Guilford.
[9]. Finkel, E. (2012). “Flipping the Script in k12”. District Administration, Vol. 48, No. 10, pp. 28-34.
[10]. Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. 1968. Trans. Myra Bergman Ramos. New York: Herder.
[11]. Gilgore, S. (2015). “Probing the Impact of Parent- Teacher Digital Communication”. Education Week, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 1-16.
[12]. Glanvile, J.L., and Wildhagen, T. (2007). “The Measurement of School Engagement: Assessing Dimensionality and Measurement Invariance Across Race and Ethnicity ”. Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 67, pp. 1019-1041.
[13]. Goral, T. (2013). “A Conversation with Tony Bates”. University Business, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 44-45.
[14]. Hirumi, A. (2002). “Student-Centered, Technology- Rich Learning Environments (SCenTRLE): Operationalizing Constructivist Approaches to Teaching and Learning”. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 497-538.
[15]. Jones, E.A. (2002). “Transforming the Curriculum: Preparing Students for a Changing World”. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 1-101.
[16]. Jukes, I., McCain, T., and Crockett, (2008). Understanding the Digital Generation: Teaching and Learning in the New Digital Landscape. Vancouver BC Canada: Corwin A Sage Company.
[17]. Langer, (1997). The Power of Mindful Learning. Reading, MA: Lifelong Books.
[18]. Langer, (2000). “Mindful Learning”. Current Directions in Psychological Science, Vol. 9, No. 6, pp. 220-223.
[19]. Lechak, J.R. and Leber, A.B. (2012). “Individual differences in distraction by motion predicted by neural activity in MT/V5”. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Vol. 6, No. 12, pp. 1-10.
[20]. Meyer, A., Rose, D.H., and Gordon, D. (2014). Universal Design for Learning: Theory and Practice. Wakefield, MA: CAST.
[21]. Min, K., and Siegel, C. (2011). “Integration of Smart Board Technology And Effective Teaching”. i-manager's Journal on School Educational Technology, 7(1), Jun-Aug 2011, Print ISSN: 0973-2217, E-ISSN: 2230-7133, pp. 38-47.
[22]. Onder, R. and Aydin, H. (2016). “Students' Views towards the Usage of Smart Board in Biology Lessons”. imanager's Journal on School Educational Technology, 11(3), Dec 2015-Feb 2016, Print ISSN: 0973-2217, E-ISSN: 2230-7133, pp.18-28.
[23]. Painter, D.D., Whitting, E.,and Wolters, B. (2005). “The Use of Interactive Whiteboard in Promoting Interactive Teaching and Learning”. VSTE Journal, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 31-40.
[24]. Piaget, (1972). To Understand is to Invent. New York, NY: Viking Press, Inc.
[25]. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. Retrieved from http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/P rensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Imm igrants%20- %20Part1.pdf
[26]. Ratey, J.J., and Loehr, J.E. (2011). “The Positive Impact of Physical Activity on Cognition During Adulthood: A Review of Underlying Mechanisms, Evidence and Recommendations”. Rev. Neurosci., Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 171-185.
[27]. Rose, D.H., and Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching Every Student in the Digital Age: Universal Design for Learning. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
[28]. Scott-Webber, L. (2012). “Institutions, Educators, and Designers: Wake Up!: Current Teaching and Learning Places Along with Teaching Strategies are Obsoletest teaching Styles and Learning Spaces must Change for 21 - Century Needs”. Planning for Higher Education, Vol. 41, No. 1, pp. 265.
[29]. Scott-Webber, L., Strickland, A., and Kapitula, L.R. (2013). “Built Environments Impact Behaviors: Results of an Active Learning Post-Occupancy Evaluation: The study shows that Rigorous Research Methods Embedded in the Design of Product(s) and Contextual Solutions Result in Measureable Improvements”. Planning for Higher Education Journal, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 28-39.
[30]. Selwyn, N. (2007). “The Use of Computer Technology in University Teaching and Learning: A Critical Perspective”. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 83-94. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00204.x
[31]. Sheets, B. H. (1991). “Book Review of Growing up Digital: The Rise of the Net Generation”. Information Technology, Learning and Performance Journal, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 53-56.
[32]. Siegel, C. (2005a). “An Ethnographic Inquiry of Cooperative Learning Implementation”. Journal of School Psychology, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 319-329.
[33]. Siegel, C. (2005b). “Implementing a Research-based Model of Cooperative Learning”. Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 98, No. 6, pp. 339-349.
[34]. Smith, F., Hardman, F., and Higgins, S. (2006). “The Impact of Interactive Whiteboards on Teacher-Pupil Interaction in the National Literacy and Numeracy Strategies”. British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 437-451.
[35]. Spradley, J.P., and McCurdy, D.W. (1980). Anthropology, the Cultural Perspective. John Wiley & Sons.
[36]. Stedman, L.C. (1997). “International Achievement Differences: An Assessment of a New Perspective”. Educ. Res., Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 4-15.
[37]. Tyner, K. (2010). Media Literacy: New Agendas in Communication. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
[38]. Vygotsky, (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.