References
[1]. Anning, A. (1994). Dilemmas and Opportunities of a
New Curriculum: Design and Technology with Young
Children. International Journal of Technology and Design
Education, 4 (2), 155-177.
[2]. Anning, A. (1997). Drawing Out Ideas: Graphicacy and Young Children. International Journal of Technology
and Design Education, 7 (3), 219-239.
[3]. Anttila, P. (1993). Käsityön ja muotoilun teoreettiset
perusteet (The theoretical basis for craft and design).
Porvoo: WSOY.
[4]. Autio, O. (1997). Oppilaiden teknisten valmiuksien
kehittyminen peruskoulussa. (Students development in
technical abilities in Finnish comprehensive school).
Publications 177 of the teacher training college of the
University of Helsinki.
[5]. Autio, O. & Hansen, R. (2002). Defining and Measuring
Technical Thinking: Students´ Technical Abilities in Finnish
Comprehensive Schools. Journal of Technology
Education, 14 (1), 5-19.
[6]. Autio, O. (2005). Project-based Meaningful Learning.
In Papadourakis, G. & Lazaridis, I. (Eds.) New Horizons in
Industry Business and Education (pp. 135-140).
Technological Educational Institute of Crete.
[7]. Benenson; G. (2001). The Unrealized Potential of
Everyday Technology as a Context for Learning. Journal of
Research in Science Teaching, 38 (7), 730-745.
[8]. Cajas, F. (2001). The Science / Technology Interaction:
Implications for Science Literacy. Journal of Research in
Science Teaching, 38 (7), 715-729.
[9]. Dakers, J. (2005). The Hegemonic Behaviorist Cycle.
International Journal of Technology and Design
Education, 15 (2), 111-126.
[10]. Doppelt, Y. (2005). Assessment of Project-Based
Learning in a Mechatronics Context. Journal of
Technology Education, 16 (2), 7-24.
[11]. Davydov, V.V. (1977). Arten der Verallgemeinerung
im Unterricht. Berlin: Volk und Wissen,
[12]. Davydov, V.V. (1982). The psychological structure
and content of learning activity in schoolchildren. In R.
Glaser & J. Lompscher (eds.) Cognitive and motivational
aspects of instruction, 37-44. Berlin: Deutscher Verlag der
Wissenschaften.
[13]. Dow, W. (2006). The need to change pedagogies in
science and technology subjects: a European
perspective. International Journal of Technology and
Design Education, 16 (3), 307-321.
[14]. Engeström, Y. (1981). Mielekäs oppiminen ja opetus
(Meaningful learning and teaching) Valtion
koulutuskeskus, julkaisusarja B 17. Helsinki: VAPK.
[15]. Engeström, Y. (1990). Perustietoa opetuksesta (Basic
knowledge about teaching), Helsinki: VAPK.
[16]. Fleer, M. (2000). Working Technologically:
Investigations into how Young Children Design and Make
during Technology education. International Journal of
Technology and Design Education, 10 (1), 43-59.
[17]. Galperin, P.J. (1972). Die geistige Handlung als
Grundlage fur die Bildung von Gedanken und
Vorstellungen. In Probleme der Lerntheorie. Berlin: Volk
und Wissen.
[18]. Galperin, P.J. (1979). Johdatus psykologiaan
(Introduction to psychology). Helsinki: Kansankulttuuri.
[19]. Hennessey, S. & McCormick, R. (1994). The General
Problem Solving Process in Technology Education. In
Banks, F. (ed.) Teaching and Learning Technology.
London: Routledge.
[20]. Hill, A. (1998). Problem-solving in Real Life Contexts:
An Alternative for Design in Technology Education.
International Journal of Design and Technology
Education, 8 (3), 203-220.
[21]. Hill, A. & Smith, H. (2005). Research in Purpose and
Value for the Study of Technology in Secondary Schools: A
Theory of Authentic Learning. Journal of Design and
Technology Education, 15 (1), 19-32.
[22]. International Technology Education Association.
(2000). Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for
the Study of Technology. Reston, VA.
[23]. Johnsey, R. (1995). The Design Process: Does it exist?
A Critical Review of Published Models for the Design
Process in England and Wales. International Journal of
Technology and Design Education, 5 (1), 199217.
[24]. Kimbell, R. (1997). Assessing Technology:
International Trends in Curriculum and Assessment.
Buckingham: Open University.
[25]. Mammes, I. (2004). Promoting Girls´ Interest in
Technology through Technology Education: A Research Study. International Journal of Technology and Design
Education, 14 (2), 89-100.
[26]. Mawson, B. (2007). Factors Affecting Learning in
Technology in the Early Years at School. International
Journal of Technology and Design Education, 17 (3),
253-269.
[27]. Parkinson, E. (2001). Teacher Knowledge and
Understanding of Design and Technology for Children in
the 3-11 Age Group: A Study focusing on aspects of
structures. Journal of Technology Education, 13 (1), 44-
58.
[28]. Peltonen, J. (1988). Käsityökasvatuksen perusteet
(Basics of craft education). Publications A: 132 of the
University of Turku.
[29]. Rogers, G. & Wallace, J. (2000). The Wheels of the
Bus: Children Designing in an Early Years Classroom.
Research in Science and Technology Education, 18 (1),
127-136.
[30]. Rowell, P. (2002). Peer Interactions in Shared
Technological Activity: A Study in Participation.
International Journal of Technology and Design
Education, 12 (1), 1-22.
[31]. Rowell, P. (2004). Developing Technological
Stance: Children's Learning in Technology Education.
International Journal of Technology and Design
Education, 14 (1), 45-59.
[32]. Ryan, R.M. & Deci, E.L. (2000). Self-determination
theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social
development and wellbeing. American Psychologist,
55, 68-78.
[33]. Schauble, L., Klopfer, L. & Raghaven, K. (1991).
Students Transition from an Engineering Model to a
Science Model of Experimentation. Journal of Research in
Science Teaching, 28 (9), 859-882.
[34]. Silverman, S. & Pritchard, A. (1996). Building Their
Future: Girls and Technology Education in Connecticut.
Journal of Technology Education, 7 (2), 41-54.
[35]. Suojanen, U. (1991). Käsityöllisten työprosessien ja
niiden opetuksen kehittäminen toimintatutkimuksen
avulla (Development of the working processes and their
teaching in craft education with the help of action
research). Publications C:86 of the University of Turku.
[36]. Suojanen, U. (1993). Käsityökasvatuksen perusteet
(Basics of craft education). Porvoo: WSOY.
[37]. Weber, K. & Custer, R. (2005). Gender-based
Preferences toward Technology Education Content,
Activities, and Instructional Methods. Journal of
Technology Education, 16 (2), 55-71.
[38]. Welch, M. (1999). Analyzing the Tacit Strategies of
Novice Designers. Research in Science and Technological
Education, 17 (1), 19-34.
[39]. Weston, R.F. (1990). Defining Design and Technology.
Journal of Design & Technology Teaching,. 23 (2), 31-34.
[40]. Williams, J. (2000). Design: The Only Methodology of
Technology? Journal of Technology Education, 11 (2), 48-61.
[41]. Williams, A., & Williams, J. (1997). Problem Based
Learning: An Appropriate Methodology for Technology
Education. Research in Science & Technological
Education, 15 (1), 91-103.
