Factors Affecting Participation of Preservice Teachers in E-Democracy

Serkan Sendag*, Sacip Toker**
* Associate Professor, Computer Education and Instructional Technology, School of Education, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey.
** Ph.D holder, Instructional Technology, Department of Administrative and Organizational Studies, College of Education, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Periodicity:July - September'2016
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.13.2.8162

Abstract

This study aimed to reveal the factors associated with the participation of preservice teachers in e-democracy. It was designed as a correlational study and 1,519 preservice teachers from a teacher preparation program in Turkey participated in it by completing a 54-item questionnaire. As a result, three major factors for involvement in e-democracy emerged: knowledge and environment, ethics, and anxiety. In addition, two types of participation were revealed: anonymous and onymous. The results of the study showed that anonymous participation correlates positively with Political Knowledge, and negatively with Current State of Politics and Digital Integrity. Those who have mobile technologies with internet connection are more likely to participate anonymously in e-democracy. On the other hand, Onymous participation, correlates positively with Fear of Self-expression, and negatively with Political Knowledge and Digital Citizenship. Males were shown to be more prone to both types of participation than females. Internet usage frequency was a common variable triggering both types of participation. The paper ends with recommendations for further research.

Keywords

E-Democracy, E-Participation, Preservice Teachers, Explanatory Higher-Order Factor Analysis, Multiple and Quantile Regression

How to Cite this Article?

Sendag,S., and Toker, S. (2016). Factors Affecting Participation of Preservice Teachers in E-Democracy. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 13(2), 30-46. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.13.2.8162

References

[2]. Åström, J., Karlsson, M., Linde, J., and Pirannejad, A. (2012). “Understanding the rise of e-participation in nondemocracies: Domestic and international factors”. Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 142-150.
[3]. Bailey, A., & Ngwenyama, O. (2011). “The challenge of e-participation in the digital city: Exploring generational influences among community telecentre users”. Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 204-214.
[4]. Berghel, H. (2000). “Digital politics 2000”. Communications-ACM, Vol. 43, No. 11, pp. 17-22.
[5]. Breindl, Y., & Francq, P. (2008). “Can Web 2.0 applications save e-democracy? A study of how new internet applications may enhance citizen participation in the political process online”. International Journal of Electronic Democracy, Vol. 1(1), pp.14-31.
[6]. Brown, T.A. (2006). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research: Guilford Press.
[7]. Buchinsky, M. (1994). Changes in the US wage structure 1963-1987: Application of quantile regression”. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pp.405-458.
[8]. Buchinsky, M. (1995). “Quantile regression, Box-Cox transformation model, and the US wage structure 1963– 1987”. Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 65(1), pp.109-154.
[9]. Cardoso, G., Cunha, C., & Nascimento, S. (2006). “Bridging the e-democracy gap in Portugal: MPs, ICTs and political mediation”. Information, Communication & Society, Vol. 9(4), pp. 452-472.
[11]. Chadwick, A. (2008). “Web 2.0: New challenges for the study of e-democracy in an era of informational exuberance”. ISJLP, Vol. 5, No. 9.
[12]. Chadwick, A. (2003). “Bringing E-Democracy Back In Why it Matters for Future Research on Egovernance”. Social Science Computer Review, Vol. 21(4), pp. 443-455.
[13]. Coleman, S., & Norris, D.F. (2005). “A new agenda for e-democracy.Oxford Internet Institute”. Forum Discussion Paper No. 4, January 2005. Retrieved on January 7, 2014 from http://www.ukn.inettr.org.tr/oii/FD4.pdf
[14]. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, And Evaluating Quantitative And th Qualitative Research, 4 Edition. Boston, MA: Pearson.
[15]. Cullen, R., & Sommer, L. (2011). “Participatory democracy and the value of online community networks: An exploration of online and offline communities engaged in civil society and political activity”. Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 28(2), pp. 148-154.
[16]. Curtice, J., & Norris, P. (2004). “e-politics? The impact of the internet on political trust and participation”. British st Social Attitudes: The 21 Report.
[17]. Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
[18]. Durndell, A., & Haag, Z. (2002). “Computer self efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes towards the Internet and reported experience with the Internet, by gender, in an East European sample”. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 18(5), pp. 521-535.
[19]. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. Sage Publications Limited.
[20]. Garrett, R. K., & Jensen, M. J. (2011). “E-Democracy Writ Small: The impact of the Internet on citizen access to local elected officials”. Information, Communication & Society, Vol. 14(2), pp. 177-197.
[21]. Gil de Zúñiga, H., Veenstra, A., Vraga, E., & Shah, D. (2010). “Digital democracy: Reimagining pathways to political participation”. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, Vol. 7(1), pp. 36-51.
[22]. Gorsuch, R.L. (1983). Factor Analysis, 2nd Edition. Erlbaum.
[23]. Gross, T. (2000). “Technological support for e-democracy: History and perspectives”. Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on the Database and Expert Systems Applications, 2000.
[24]. Grönlund, Å. (2003a). “E-democracy: In search of tools and methods for effective participation”. Journal of MultiCriteria Decision Analysis, Vol. 12(2&3), pp. 93-100.
[25]. Grönlund, Å. (2003b). “Emerging Electronic Infrastructures Exploring Democratic Components”. Social Science Computer Review, Vol. 21(1), pp. 55-72.
[26]. Hacker, Kenneth L., and Jan van Dijk, (2000). “What Is Digital Democracy?” In Digital Democracy: Issues of Theory & Practice, edited by Kenneth L. Hacker and Jan van Dijk, pp. 1–9. London: Sage.
[28]. Kampen, J. K., & Snijkers, K. (2003). “E-Democracy-A Critical Evaluation of the Ultimate E-Dream”. Social Science Computer Review, Vol. 21(4), pp. 491-496.
[29]. Karickhoff, M., & Howley, A. (1997). “Democracy in teacher education: Equality verses excellence”. The Teacher Educator, Vol. 33(2), pp. 61-69.
[30]. Koenker, R., & Bassett Jr, G. (1978). “Regression quantiles”. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pp. 33-50.
[31]. Levin, T., & Gordon, C. (1989). Effect of gender and computer experience on attitudes toward computers”. Journal of Educational Computing Research, Vol. 5(1), pp. 69-88.
[32]. Lidén, G. (2015). “Technology and democracy: validity in measurements of e-democracy”. Democratization, Vol. 22(4), pp. 698-713.
[33]. Lidén, G. (2012). “Is e-democracy more than democratic?-An examination of the implementation of socially sustainable values in e-democratic processes”. Electronic Journal of e-Government, Vol. 10(1), pp. 84-94.
[34]. Long, J.S., & Ervin, L.H. (2000). “Using heteroscedasticity consistent standard errors in the linear regression model”. The American Statistician, Vol. 54(3), pp. 217-224.
[35]. Macintosh, A., Robson, E., Smith, E., & Whyte, A. (2003). “Electronic democracy and young people”. Social Science Computer Review, Vol. 21(1), pp. 43-54.
[36]. Macintosh, Ann, Stephen Coleman, and Agnes Schneeberger, (2009). “e-Participation: The Research Gaps”. In Electronic Participation, edited by Ann Macintosh and Efthimios Tambouris, 5694: 1–11. Berlin: Springer.
[37]. Mahrer, H., & Krimmer, R. (2005). “Towards the enhancement of e-democracy: Identifying the notion of the ‘ middleman paradox’ ”. Information Systems Journal, Vol. 15(1), pp. 27-42.
[38]. Moursund, D., & Bielefeldt, T. (1999). “Will new teachers be prepared to teach in a digital age?”. A National Survey on Information Technology in Teacher Education. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Family Foundation.
[39]. Morrell, M. E. (2010). Empathy and Democracy: Feeling, Thinking, and Deliberation, Penn State Press.
[40]. Mosteller, F., & Tukey, J. W. (1977). “Data analysis and regression: A Second Course in Statistics”. Addison-Wesley Series in Behavioral Science: Quantitative Methods, Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1977, 1.
[41]. Oral, B. (2008). “The evaluation of the student teachers’ attitudes toward Internet and democracy”. Computers & Education, Vol. 50(1), pp. 437-445.
[42]. Parvez, Z., & Ahmed, P. (2006). Towards building an integrated perspective on e-democracy”. Information, Community & Society, Vol. 9(5), pp. 612-632.
[43]. Saebo, O., & Paivarinta, T. (2005). “Autopoietic cybergenres for e-Democracy? Genre analysis of a th webbased discussion board”. Proceedings of the 38 Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2005, HICSS'05.
[44]. Schmid, J., & Leiman, J.M. (1957). “The development of hierarchical factor solutions”. Psychometrika, Vol. 22(1), pp. 53-61.
[45]. Skoric, M. M., & Park, Y. J. (2014). “Culture, technologies and democracy: A cross-national analysis of political development”. Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 31(3), pp. 364-375.
[46]. Susha, I., & Grönlund, Å. (2014). “Context clues for the stall of the Citizens’ Initiative: Lessons for opening up eparticipation development practice”. Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 31(3), pp. 454-465.
[48]. Sendag, S. (2014). “An e-democracy application: Do not let my dreams of an ideal university stay only in my dreams”. International Journal on New Trends in Education and their Implications, Vol. 5(1), pp. 53-63.
[49]. Shelley II, M. C., Thrane, L. E., & Shulman, S. W. (2006). “Lost in cyberspace: Barriers to bridging the digital divide in e-politics”. International Journal of Internet and Enterprise Management, Vol. 4(3), pp. 228-243.
[50]. Shirazi, F., Ngwenyama, O., & Morawczynski, O. (2010). “ICT expansion and the digital divide in democratic freedoms: An analysis of the impact of ICT expansion, education and ICT filtering on democracy”. Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 27(1), pp. 21-31.
[51]. Stevens, J.P. (2001). Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum.
[52]. Tabachnick, B.G, & Fidell, L.S. (2001). Multivariate Statistics. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn
[53]. Thomas, L.A. (1995). “The Use of Second-Order Factor Analysis in Psychological Research”. Retrieved on November 13 , 2013 from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED382676.pdf
[54]. Thrane, L. E., Shelley, M. C., Shulman, S. W., Beisser, S. R., & Larson, T. B. (2005). “E-Political Empowerment: Age Effects or Attitudinal Barriers?”, Journal of E-Government, Vol. 1(4), pp. 21-37.
[55]. Vasilis, T., & Dimitris, K. (2010). “e-Democracy: The Political Culture of Tomorrow’s Citizens Next Generation Society”. Technological and Legal Issues, pp.99-107, Springer.
[56]. Watson, R. T, & Mundy, B. (2001). “A strategic perspective of electronic democracy”. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 44(1), pp. 27-30.
[57]. Wattal, S., Schuff, D., Mandviwalla, M., & Williams, C. B. (2010). “Web 2.0 and politics: The 2008 US presidential election and an e-politics research agenda”. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 34(4), pp. 669-688.
[58]. Weeks, E. C. (2000). “The Practice of Deliberative Democracy: Results from Four Large-Scale Trials”. Public Administration Review, Vol. 60(4), pp. 360-372.
[59]. White, H. (1980). “A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity ”. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pp. 817-838.
[60]. Yigit, E. Ö., & Çolak, K. (2010). “The opinions of the preservice teachers about e-democracy in Turkey”. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 2(2), pp. 712-716.
[61]. You, K. H., Lee, J. K., Kang, H., & Go, E. (2015). “Participatory or deliberative democracy? Exploring the mediation effects of perceived online deliberation and online interactive activities on social outcomes”. Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 32(2), pp. 205-214.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.