Student Collaboration and School Educational Technology: Technology Integration Practices in the Classroom

Kathleen Scalise*
Associate Professor, University of Oregon, USA.
Periodicity:March - May'2016
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.11.4.6012

Abstract

With the onset of Web 2.0 and 3.0 – the social and semantic webs – a next wave for integration of educational technology into the classroom is occurring. The aim of this paper is to show how some teachers are increasingly bringing collaboration and shared meaning-making through technology environments into learning environments (Evergreen Education Group, 2014). Purpose is to show a case study of how teachers include student-to-student online collaboration in their Technology Integration Practices (TIP), and how some research projects are examining useful methodologies for incorporating evaluation, assessment and reflection of the approaches (Wilson et al., 2012; Wilson, Scalise, & Gochyyev, 2014). Results from the use of TIP collaborative math/science notebooks in the Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills (ATC21S) project are presented. Recommendations are to help teachers answer key questions about how to assess and evaluate collaborative work online, and how to employ such techniques in the classroom.

Keywords

Collaboration, Collaborative Learning, Social and Emotional Learning, Learning in Social Networks, Technology Integration Planning, TIP, Digital Literacy, ICT Literacy, Assessment, Evaluation, Item Response Models, Case Study, ATC21S, 21st Century Skills, Science Education, Mathematics Education, STEM.

How to Cite this Article?

Scalise , K. (2016). Student Collaboration and School Educational Technology: Technology Integration Practices in the Classroom. i-manager's Journal on School Educational Technology, 11(4), 53-63. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.11.4.6012

References

[1]. Barron, A. E., Kemker, K., Harmes, C., & Kalaydjian, K. (2003). “Large-Scale Research Study on Technology in K12 Schools: Technology Integration as It Relates to the National Technology Standards”. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, Vol. 25(4), pp. 489-507.
[2]. Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). “Defining Twenty- First Century Skills”. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills, Vol. 1. Dordrecht, New York: Springer.
[3]. Evergreen Education Group, (2014). Keeping Pace with K-12 Digital Learning: An Annual Review of Policy and Practice. Retrieved from http://www.kpk12.com/reports/
[4]. Friedman, T. L. (2007). The World is Flat 3.0: A Brief History of the Twenty-first Century. New York: Picador.
[5]. Griffin, P., McGaw, B., & Care, E. (2012). Assessment and Teaching of 2st1 Century Skills. Dordrecht, New York: Springer.
[6]. Kozma, R. B. (Ed.). (2003). Technology, Innovation, and Educational Change: A Global Perspective. International Society for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement, Eugene.
[7]. McFarlane, A. (2003). “Assessment for the digital age”. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, Vol. 10, pp. 261-266.
[8]. Partnership for 21st Century Skills (Producer), (2009). Framework for 21st Century Learning, 21st Century Student Outcomes and Support Systems. Retrieved from http://www.21stcenturyskills.org
[9]. Partnership for 21st Century Skills & American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education, (2010). 21st Century Knowledge and Skills in Educator Preparation. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/aacte_p21_whitepaper2010.pdf
[10]. Quellmalz, E.S., & Kozma, R. (2003). “Designing assessments of learning with technology”. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, pp. 389-408.
[11]. Ridgway, J., & McCusker, S. (2003). “Using computers to assess new educational goals”. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, Vol. 10, pp. 309- 328.
[12]. Roblyer, M. D. (2004). Educational Technology in Action: Problem Based Exercises for Technology Integration. New Jersey : Pearson Education International.
[13]. Roblyer, M. D. (2006). Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
[14]. Scalise, K. (2010). Generalizing In and Out: Methods of Data Collection and Observation. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon.
[15]. Scalise, K. (2013). “Planning for Transition: Evolution of Next-Generation Assessment System Designs to Support Ongoing Improvements in Measuring Complex Skills and Constructs”. CCSSO National Conference on Student Assessment.
[16]. Scalise, K. (2014). “Technology Enhanced Assessments in NAEP”. California Educational Research Association (CERA) Conference: Building California's Future: Strategies for Achieving Coherence among Standards, Instruction, Assessment, and Evaluation.
[17]. Schrum, L., & Levin, B.B. (2014). Evidence-Based Strategies for Leading 2st1 Century Schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
[18]. Somekh, B., & Mavers, D. (2003). “Mapping learning potential: Students' conceptions of ICT in their world”. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, Vol. 10, pp. 409-420.
[19]. Wessling, S. B. (Producer). (2012). “Google Docs in the Classroom”. Grades 9-12 / All Subjects / Collaboration. Retrieved from http: www.teachingchannel.org/videos/ fostering-student-collaboration
[20]. Wilson, M., Bejar, I., Scalise, K., Templin, J., Wiliam, D., & Torres Irribarra, D. (2012). “Perspectives on Methodological Issues”. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills, Dordrecht; New York: Springer.
[21]. Wilson, M., & Scalise, K. (2012). “Assessment of Learning in Digital Social Networks; Assessment of Technology-Based Collaboration Skills: Transforming Assessment for the 21st Century”. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, Canada.
[22]. Wilson, M., Scalise, K., & Gochyyev, P. (2014). “ICT Literacy - Learning in Digital Networks”. Paper presented at The Fourteenth Annual Maryland Conference, Technology Enhanced Innovative Assessment: Development, Modeling, and Scoring from an Interdisciplinary Perspective, College Park, MD.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.