Changes in Virtual Team Collaboration With Modern Collaboration Tools

Viju Raghupathi*
Assistant Professor, Department of Business Management, Kopelman School of Business, Brooklyn College, City University of New York, New York, USA.
Periodicity:March - May'2016
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jit.5.2.5998

Abstract

The evolution of information technology that transcends time and space has enabled organizations to leverage virtual team collaboration. New collaborative technology, such as Google Apps/Google Docs, has disrupted traditional assumptions about collaboration. This empirical study on virtual teams examines how social and technical influences shape collaboration. It analyzes the performance and process of collaboration to detect changes, if any, brought about by modern collaboration tools, as well as the implications to organizations that deploy virtual teams. The findings show that new tools promote changes in the process of collaboration from a sequential to an iterative cycle of discussion and production. Practitioners can benefit from the insights of this study by evaluating the nature of teams and the support provided for their collaboration. In addition, collaborative technology has differential effects based on the social dynamics that occur within virtual teams.

Keywords

Virtual Team, Collaboration, Technology, Artifact, Production, Discussion, History, Memory.

How to Cite this Article?

Raghupathi. V (2016). Changes in Virtual Team Collaboration with Modern Collaboration Tools. i-manager’s Journal on Information Technology, 5(2), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.26634/jit.5.2.5998

References

[1]. Carlson, J. R. and R.W. Zmud, (1999). “Channel Expansion Theory and the Experiential Nature of Media Richness Perceptions”. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 153-170.
[2]. Chidambaram, L. (1996). “Relational Development in Computer-Supported Groups”. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 143-165.
[3].Cramton, C. D. (2001). “The mutual knowledge problem and its consequences for dispersed collaboration”. Organization Science, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 346-371.
[4]. Dennis, A. R. and J. S. Valacich, (1999). “Rethinking Media Richness: Towards a Theor y of Media nd Synchronocity ”. Proceedings of the 32 Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press, I, pp. 1-10.
[5]. Dennis, A. R., R. M. Fuller, and J. S. Valacich, (2008). “Media, Tasks, and Communication Processes: A Theory of Media Synchronicity”. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 575-600.
[6]. Frankforter, S. A. and S.L. Christensen, (2005). “Finding Competitive Advantage in Self-Managed Work Teams”. Business Forum, Vol. 27, No.1, pp. 20-24.
[7].Ghoshal, S., H. Korine, and G. Szulanski, (1994). “Interunit Communication in Multinational Corporations”. Management Science, Vol. 40, pp. 96-110.
[8]. Hansen, M. T. (1999). “The Search-transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge Across Organization Subunits”. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 44, pp. 82-111.
[9]. Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink, 2 edition. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
[10]. Jarvenpaa, S.L., K. Knoll, and D.E. Leidner, (1998). “Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams”. Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 29-64.
[11]. Kankanhalli, A. Tan, B.C.Y., and Wei, K. (2006). “Conflict and Performance in Global Virtual Teams”. Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 237-274.
[12]. Levin, D. Z. and R. Cross, (2004). “The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer”. Management Science, Vol. 50, No.11, pp. 1477-1490.
[13]. Maznevski, M. L., and K.M. Chudoba, (2000). “Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness”. Organization Science, Vol.11, pp. 473-492.
[14]. Muthusamy, S. K., J.V. Wheeler, and B.L. Simmons, (2005). “Self-Managing Work Teams: Enhancing Organizational Innovativeness”. Organization Development Journal, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp. 53-66.
[15]. Nunamaker, Jr., J. F., A. Dennis, J. Valacich, D. Vogel, and J. George, (1991). “Electronic Meeting Systems to Support Group Work”. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 34, No. 7, pp. 40-61.
[16]. Ocker, R.J. (2005). “Influences on Creativity In Asynchronous Virtual Teams: A Qualitative Analysis of Experimental Teams”. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communications, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 22-39.
[17]. Powell A., Piccoli G., and Ives B. (2004). “Virtual teams: A review of current literature and direction for future research”. Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 6-36.
[18]. Purvanova, R.K. (2014). “Face-to-Face Versus Virtual Teams: What Have We Really Learned?” The Psychologist- Manager Journal, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 2-29.
[19]. Sarmiento, J.H. and G. Stahl, (2008). “Group Creativity in Interaction: Collaborative Referencing, Remembering, and Bridging”. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 24, No. 5, pp. 492- 504.
[20]. Sethi, R., Smith, D.C., and Park, C.W., (2002). “How To Kill A Team's Creativity?” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 80, No.8, pp. 16-17.
[21]. Strubler, D.C. and K.M. York, (2007). “An Exploratory Study of the Team Characteristics Model using Organizational Teams”. Small Group Research, Vol. 38, No. 6, pp. 670-695.
[22]. Szulanski, G. (1996). “Exploring Internal Stickiness: Impediments to the Transfer of Best Practice within the Firm”. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 17, pp. 27-43.
[23]. Terzakis, J. (2011). “Virtual Retrospectives for Geographically Dispersed Software Teams”. IEEE Software, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 12-15.
[24]. Tyran, C.K. and J.F. George, (2002). “Improving Software Inspections with Group Process Support”. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 45, No. 9, pp. 87-92.
[25]. Uzzi, B. (1996). “The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness For The Economic Performance of Organizations: The Network Effect ”. American Sociological Review, Vol. 61, pp. 674-698.
[26]. Uzzi, B. (1997). “Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness”. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 42, pp. 35-67.
[27]. Walther, J.B. (1995). “Relational Aspects Of Computer-Mediated Communication: Experimental Observations Over Time”. Organization Science, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 186-203.
[28]. Watson, W. E., K. Kumar, and L.K. Michaelsen, (1993). “Cultural Diversity's Impact on Interaction Process and Performance: Comparing Homogeneous and Diverse Task Groups”. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 36, pp. 590-602.
[29]. Weber, R. A. (2006). “Managing Growth to Achieve Efficient Coordination In Large Groups”. American Economic Review, Vol. 96, No.1, pp. 114-126.
[30]. Yoo, Y. and M. Alavi, (2001). “Media and Group Cohesion: Relative Influences on Social Presence, Task Participation, And Group Consensus”. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 371-390.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.