This paper discusses culture, as a source of conflict than of synergy, how affects the use of new media to build digital citizenships. It also argues that the cultural dimensions of Geert Hofstede, who demonstrates that there are national and regional cultural groupings that affect the behavior of organizations, are very persistent across time. Global online cultures can be described according to the analysis of Geert Hofstede. These ideas can be first based on a large scale into local and national culture differences across subordinates of a multinational digital society. Furthermore, the authors hope that the underlying assumptions and theoretical constructs through the use of Hofstede's cultural dimensions will help digital citizens understand management in an online community, and have both knowledge and empathy with not only the whole local sight but also the global scene. In spite of calls for enhanced collaboration between online societies and different cultures, there is still altercation between digital citizens, groups and nations. On the other hand, they are uncovered to universal dilemmas, troubles and problems which demand mutual understanding for the clarification of these difficulties. Based on the cultural dimensions of Geert Hofstede, building global culture through new media helps digital citizens appreciate the diversities in the way strategists and their supporters think, offering realistic resolutions for digital citizens to help solve conflict between different groups.

">

Transformative Power Of Digital Citizenship: Critical Perspectives On Culture, New Media And Pedagogy

Gulsun Kurubacak*
* Assistant Professor, Anadolu University College of Open Educaflon, Department of Distance Educatlon ,Esklsehir TURKEY.
Periodicity:July - September'2007
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.4.2.596

Abstract

This paper discusses culture, as a source of conflict than of synergy, how affects the use of new media to build digital citizenships. It also argues that the cultural dimensions of Geert Hofstede, who demonstrates that there are national and regional cultural groupings that affect the behavior of organizations, are very persistent across time. Global online cultures can be described according to the analysis of Geert Hofstede. These ideas can be first based on a large scale into local and national culture differences across subordinates of a multinational digital society. Furthermore, the authors hope that the underlying assumptions and theoretical constructs through the use of Hofstede's cultural dimensions will help digital citizens understand management in an online community, and have both knowledge and empathy with not only the whole local sight but also the global scene. In spite of calls for enhanced collaboration between online societies and different cultures, there is still altercation between digital citizens, groups and nations. On the other hand, they are uncovered to universal dilemmas, troubles and problems which demand mutual understanding for the clarification of these difficulties. Based on the cultural dimensions of Geert Hofstede, building global culture through new media helps digital citizens appreciate the diversities in the way strategists and their supporters think, offering realistic resolutions for digital citizens to help solve conflict between different groups.

Keywords

Synergy, Multinational Digital Society, Digital Citizens.

How to Cite this Article?

Gulsun Kurubacak (2007). Transformative Power Of Digital Citizenship: Critical Perspectives On Culture, New Media And Pedagogy. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 4(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.4.2.596

References

[1]. Abbey, B. (2000}. Instructionol ond Cognitive Impocts of Web-Bosed Educotion~ Hershey, PA: Idea
[2]. &Otes, A. W. (2000). Monoging Technologicol Chonge. Son Froncisco, CA: Jossey-Boss.
[3]. Berg, G. A. (2000). "EOrly Potferns of Focuity Compensotion for Developing ond Teoching Distonce Looming Courses", The Journoi of Asynchronous Looming Networks (JALN), 4(1) Retrieved MOy 26, 2001, from http://www.oln.org/olnweb/journoi/join-voi4
[4]. Beoudoin, M. F. (2003}. "Distonce Educotion Leodership for the New Century", Online Journol of Distonce Looming Administrotion, 6(2). Retrieved November I I , 2004, from: http://www.westgo.edu/%7Edistonce/ojdlo/summer62/b eoudoin62.html
[5]. Boiiiger, D. U. & Morfindole, T. (2004). "Key Foctors For Determining Student Sotisfoction in Online Courses", internotionol Journol on E-Leorning, 3(1), 61-67
[6]. Brosio, R. A. Cl 994). A Rod|col Democrotic Critique of Copifolist Educotion. NewYork, NY: Peter Long,
[7]. &urge, L. (2000). The Strotegic Use of Looming Technoiogies~ Son Froncisco, CA: Jossey-Boss.
[8]. Burke, K. & Chidomborom, L. (1999}. "How Much Bondwidth is Enough? A Longitudinol Exominotion of Medic Chorocteristics ond Group Outcomes", MIS Quorferly, 23(4), 557-580.
[9]. Bumiske, R. W. & Monke, L. (2001}. Brooking Down the Digitoi WOOS: Looming to Yecch in o Post-Modem World, Aibony, NY: Stole University of NewYork Press.
[10]. Chuo, A. & Ngee A. R (2001). "Relotionship between the Types of Knowledge Shored ond Types of Communicotion Chonnels Used", Journoi of Knowledge Monogement Proctice, Retrieved MOy 23, 2002, from: http://www.tioinc.com/orfici26,htm
[11]. Culwin, F. , MocLeod, A. & Loncoster, T. (2001}. "Source Code Cyber-DemocrOcy in UK HE Computing Schools, Issues, Attitudes ond Tools" , South Bonk University Technicol Report SBU-CiSM-0 I -02.
[12]. Fobos, B. & Young, M . D. C I 999) . "Telecommunicotion in the Clossroom: Rhetoric versus Reolity", Reviewof Educotionol Reseorch, 69(3), 2 I 7-259.
[13]. Fisher, D. R. & Wright, L. M. (2001}. "On Utopios ond Dystopios: Toword on Understonding of the Discourse Surrounding the Internet" , Journol of Computer-Medioted Communicotion, 6(2), 1 3. Retrieved July 02, 2002, from: htpp://www.oscusc.org/jcmc/voi6/issue2/fisher.htmi
[14]. Hodson, D. (1999). "Crificoi Multicuiturolism in Science ond Technology Educotion", In S, MOy (ed.) Criticol Multiculturolism: Rethinking Multicuituroi ond Antirocist Educotion (pp~ 216-244), PhilOdelphio, PA: Folmer.
[I 5]. Howell, S. L., Williom, R B. & Lindsoy, N. K. (2003}. "Thirty-Two Trends Affecting Distonce Educotion: An informed Foundotion for Strotegic Pionning", Online Journol of Distonce Looming Administrotion, 6(3), Retrieved June 25, 2006, from: http://www~westgo~edu/~distonce/ojdio/foli63/howeil63, html
[I 6]. Hofsfede, G . J., Pedersen, R B. & Hofstede, G. (2002). Exploring Culture: Exercises, Stories, Ono Synthetic Cultures. Yormouth, ME: Infercultruoi.
[17]. Huerto, E. Ryon, T. & Igborio, M. (2003). "A Comprehensive Web-Bosed Looming Fromework: toword Theoreticol Diversity" , In A. Aggorworl (ed.) Web-Bosed Educotion: Looming from Experiences {pp. 24-35). Hershey, PA: InformotionSystem.
[I 8]. Kendoll, L. (2003). Cyberculture, In S, Jones (ed), Encyc\opedla of NewMedla (pp, 102- I 04). New York, NY: Soge.
[I 9]. Kyrish, S~ (2004). "Creoting on Online Progrom" , In D. Momolescu, C. C. Schifter & L. Greenwood (eds,) The Distonce Educotion Evoluotion: Issues ond Cose Studies (pp. I -2 I ). Hershey, PA: Info,motion Science.
[20]. Lorenz, EN. (1972). "BOrotropic lnstObility of Rossby WOve Motion", Journol of Atmosphere Sciences, 29, 258264.
[21]. Momodouh, V. D. CI 997). "PoliticOl Culture: A Typology Grounded on Culturol Theory", GeoJournol, 43(1), I 7-25,
[22]. Moy, S. (1999). "Introduction: Towords Criticol Multiculturolism", In S. MOy Ced.} Criticol Multiculturolism: Rethinking Multiculturol ond Antirocist Educotion (pp. I - I O). PhilOdelphiO, PA: Folmer.
[23]. McChesney, R. W (1999). Rich Media Poor Democrocy: Communicotlon Politics in Dubious Times. UrbonoChompoign IL: University of Illinois,
[24]. Moore, M. & Keorsley, G. (2005). Distonce Educotion: System View. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wodsworth.
[25]. Moore, R E. & Toit, A. (Eds.) (2002). Open ond Distonce Looming: Trends, Policy ond Strotegy Considerotions. Pons: UNESCO.
[26]. Neo, M. (2005). "Web-Enhonced Looming: Engoging Students in Constructivist Leoming", Compus Wide Info,motion Systems, 22(1), 4- I 4~
[27]. Nieto, S. (I 996) Affirming Diversity: The Socio/ Context of Multiculturol Educotion, White Ploins, NY: Longmon,
[28]. Picciono, A. G . (2002). Educotionol Leodership ond Plonning for Technology (3'd ed.). Columbus, OH: Upper SoddleRiver.
[29]. Porter, L. R. (2004). Developing on OnlineCurriculum: Technologies ond Techniques. Hershey, PA: InformotionSystem.
[30]. Powozek, D. (2002). "Design for Community: The Art of Connecting Reol People in Virtuol Ploces", Philosophicol Perspectives on Constructivist Views of Looming, 29C I ), 37-48.
[3 I ]. Preece, J. , Rogers, Y. & Shorp, H. (2002). Interoction Design. NewYork, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
[32]. Resto, P. (ed.) (2002). Info,motion ond Communicotion Technologies in Teocher Educotion: A Plonning Guide. Poris: UNESCO.
[33]. Rosenberg, M. J. (2001). E-Looming: Strotegies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digitol Age. Woshington, DC: McGrOw-Hill.
[34]. Schrum, L. & Benson, A. (2002). "Estoblishing Successful Online Distonce Looming Environments: Distinguishing Foctors thot Contribute to Online Courses ond Progroms", In R. Discenzo, C, Howord & K ,Schenk Ceds,) The Design & Monogement Effective Distonce Looming Progroms (pp. I 90-204}, Hershey, PA: Idea
[35]. Sheets, R. H. (2005). Diversity Pedogogy: Exomining Role of Culture in Teoching-Leorning Process. New York, NY: Peorson,
[36]. Spring, J. (1999). Wheels in the Hood: Educotionol Philosophies of Authority, Freedom, ond Culture from Socrotes to Humon Rights. Modison, WI: McGrowHill.
[37]. Stevens-Long, J. & Crowell, C. (2002). "The Design ond Delivery of Interoctlve Online Groduote Educotion", In K. E, Rudestom & J. Schoenholtz-ReOd (eds,) Hondbook of Online Looming: Innovotions Higher Educotion ond Corporote Troining {pp. 151-1 69). ThousOnd Ooks, PA.
[38]. Torres, C. A. (1998). Democrocy, Educotion, ond Multiculturolism: Dilemmos of Citizenships in o Globol World, Lonhom, MD: Rowmon & Littlefield.
[39]. Solmon, G . (2000). E-Moderotion: The Key Teoching ond Looming Online, London: Kogon Poge,
[40]. Solmon, G . (2002). E-Tivities: The Key to Active Online Looming. London: Kogon Pogo,
[41] Scordomolio, M. (2003). "Crossing the Digitol Divide: LiterOcy Os By-Product of Knowledge Building", Journol of Disfonce Educoflon, 1 7, 78-8 I ,
[42]. Stephenson, J. (Ed) (2001). Teoching ond Looming OnHne: Pedogogies for New Technologies. London: Kogon Pogo.
[43]. Willioms, R E. (2003}. "Roles ond Competencies for Disfonce Educotion Progroms in Higher EducOtion Institutions" , the Amerlcon Journol of Dlstonce Educotion, I 7(1), 45-57,
[44]. Worthen, B. R., & Senders, J. S. (I 987). Educofionol EvOluOfion: AlfernOtive ApproOches ond PrOcficOl Guidelines. White Ploins, NY: Pitmon.
[45]. Yong, Y., & Cornelious, L. F. (2005). "Preporing Instructors for Quolity Online Instruction" , Online Journol of Distonce Looming Adminlstrotlon, 8(1). Retrieved October 08 2005 from http://www.wesfgo.edu/~distonce/ojdlo/spring8l/yong8 I .hfml
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.