Effect of Low Fowler's Position on Back Pain and Vascular Complicationsfollowing Trans-Femoral Cardiac Catheterization: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Jogindra Vati*, Tintu K. Mathew**, Yash Paul Sharma***
* Professor and Principal, SGHSCON, Mohali, Punjab, India.
** Clinical Nurse, AIIMS Hospital, New Delhi, India.
*** Head & Department of Cardiology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India.
Periodicity:February - April'2016
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jnur.6.1.5916

Abstract

Cardiac catheterization remains the gold standard diagnostic test and evaluation for coronary heart diseases. The aim ° of this study was to investigate the effect of low fowler's position (30 ) on the severity of back pain and local vascular complications following transfemoral cardiac catheterization. A Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) is the design principle used here. The study was conducted in the Advanced Cardiac Centre of Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India. A total 60 patients scheduled for elective transfemoral diagnostic cardiac catheterization were included in the study. Patients were randomly assigned to the control group (n=30) and the experimental group (n=30). Data were collected through the self developed 'Interview schedule, 'Numerical pain intensity scale', and 'Vascular complications assessment' tools after checking its validity and reliability. Low fowler's position protocol and the protocol for assessing vascular complications were also developed. Both groups were restricted to bed rest for first 2 hours following the procedure in supine position with the affected leg straight and immobilized. After 2 hours, patients in the control group (n=30) were receiving conventional care in supine position and patients of the experimental group (n=30) were restricted to bed rest in low fowler's position with the head of the bed elevated to 30 degree. Severity of back pain was assessed at regular time intervals of 2, 4, 6 hours of post cardiac catheterization. Local vascular complications (hematoma, ecchymosis, and bleeding) were assessed at the time of removal of dressing at 12 hours after catheterization. The experimental group patients significantly had less back pain than the control group (p<0.01) at 4 hours and 6 hours after cardiac catheterization. The control group patients (on supine position) significantly developed ecchymosis as compared to the experimental group (on low fowler position) (p<0.02) at the time of removal of dressing from the puncture site. None of the patient developed hematoma in both groups. There was no major bleeding in any of the groups. Nursing patients in low fowler's position at 30 degree during the early hours after cardiac catheterization can minimize the severity of back pain and ecchymosis.

Keywords

Cardiac Catheterization, Low Fowler's Position, Patient's Outcome, Back Pain, Vascular Complications.

How to Cite this Article?

Vati, J., Mathew, T.K., and Sharma, Y.P. (2016). Effect of Low Fowler's Position on Back Pain and Vascular Complications following Trans-Femoral Cardiac Catheterization: A Randomized Controlled Trial. i-manager’s Journal on Nursing, 6(1), 24-31. https://doi.org/10.26634/jnur.6.1.5916

References

[1]. Babu, S.C., Piccorelli, G.O., Shah, P.M., et al., (1989). “Incidence and results of arterial complications among 16,350 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization”. J Vasc Surg, Vol.10, No. 2, pp.113-116.
[2]. Benson, G. (2004). “Changing patient's position in bed after non-emergency coronary angiography reduced back pain”. Evid Based Nurs, Vol. 7, pp. 1-9.
[3]. Botti, M., Williamson, B., Steen, K., and et al., (1998). “The effect of pressure bandaging on complications and comfort in patients undergoing cardiac angiography: A multicenter randomized trial”. Heart Lung, Vol. 27, pp. 360- 373.
[4]. Brener, B.J., & Couch, N.P. (1973 ). “Peripheral arterial complications of left heart catheterization and their management”. The Am J Surg, Vol.125, pp. 521-526.
[5]. Chair, S.Y., Taylor-Piliae, R.E., Lam, G., et al. (2003). “Effect of positioning on back pain after coronary angiography”. J. Adv Nurs, Vol. 42 ,No. 5, pp. 470-478.
[6]. Chair, S.Y., Li, K.M., & Wong, S.W. (2004). “Factors that affect back pain among Hong Kong Chinese patients after cardiac catheterization”. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs, Vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 279 -285.
[7]. Chair, S.Y., Thompson, D.R., & Li, S.K. (2007). “The effect of ambulation after cardiac catheterization on patient outcomes”. J. Clin Nurs, Vol. 16, No.1, pp. 212-214.
[8]. Dumont, C.J., Keeling, A.W., Bourquiqnon, C., et al., (2006). “Predictors of vascular complications post diagnostic cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary interventions”. Dimens. Crit. Care Nurs, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp.137-142.
[9]. Fowlow, B., Price, P., & Fung, T. (1995). “Ambulation after sheath removal: A comparison of 6 and 8 hour of bed rest after sheath removal in patients following a PTCA procedure”. Heart Lung, Vol. 24, No.1, pp. 28-37.
[10]. Kasper, D.L., Braunwald, E., Fauci, A.S., et al., (2005). Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine. 16 Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 436-442.
[11]. Keeling, A.W., Taylor, V., Nondt, L.A., et al., (1996). “Reducing time in bed after cardiac catheterization (TIBSII)”. Am J Crit Care, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 277-281.
[12]. Loaville, A.B., Legroux-Gerot, I., Corter, B., et al., (2003). “Pin management in a rheumatology department: A satisfactory survey”. Joint Bone Spine, Vol. 70, pp. 362- 366.
[13]. Logemann, T., Luetmer, P., Kaliebe, J., et al. (1999). “Two versus six hours of bed rest following left sided cardiac catheterization and a meta-analysis of early ambulation trials”. Am J Cardiol, Vol. 84, pp. 486-488.
[14]. Lunden, M.H., Bengtson, A., & Lundgren, S.M. (2006). “Hours during and after coronary intervention and angiography”. Clin Nurs Res, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 274- 289.
[15]. Machleder, H.I., Sweeney, J.P., Barker, W.F. (1972). “Pulseless arm after brachial artery catheterization”. Lancet, Vol. 1, No. 7747, pp. 407-409.
[16]. McCabe, P.J., McPhreson, L.A., Lohse, C.M. & Weaver, A..L. (2001). “Evaluation of nursing care after diagnostic coronary angiography”. Am J of Critical Care, Vol. 10, No. 5, pp. 330 -340.
[17]. Pooler-Lunse, C., Barkman, A., & Block, B.F. (1996). “Effects of modified positioning and mobilization of back pain and delayed bleeding in patients who had received heparin and undergone angiography: A pilot study”. Heart Lung, Vol. 25, No. 2, pp. 117-123.
[18]. Rezaei-Adaryani, M., Ahmadi, F., Mohamadi, E., & Asghari-Jafarabadi M. (2009a). “The effect of three positioning methods on patient outcomes after cardiac catheterization”. J Adv Nurs, Vol. 65, No. 2, pp. 417-424.
[19]. Rezaei-Adaryani, M., Ahmadi, F., Mohamadi, E., & Asghari-Jafarabadi M. (2009b). “The effect of changing position and early ambulation after cardiac catheterization on patients' outcome: A single-blind randomized controlled trial”. Int J. Nurs Stud, Vol. 46, No. 8, pp. 1047-1053.
[20]. Roebuck, A., Jessop, S., Turner, R., & Caplin, J.L. (2000). “The safety of two-hour versus four-hour bed rest after elective 6-French femoral cardiac catheterization”. Coronary Health Care, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp.169–173.
[21]. Sabzaligol, M., Wittmerg, L.E., & Lundgern, S.M. (2008). “The effect of changing position and early ambulation after cardiac catheterization on back pain and bleeding”. Int J Nurs Stud, Vol. 34, No. 7, pp. 1157- 1173.
[22]. Steffenino, G., Dutto, S., Conte, L., et al., (2006). “ Vascular access complications after cardiac catheterisation: A nurse-led quality assurance program”. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs, Vol. 5, No.1, pp. 31-6.
[23]. West R., Ellis, G., & Brooks, N. (2006). “Complications of diagnostic cardiac catheterization: Results from a confidential inquiry into cardiac catheter complications”. Heart, Vol. 92, pp. 810-814.
[24]. Winslow, H.E. (1996). “Too much bed rest after cardiac catheterization”. The Am J Nurs, Vol. 96, pp. 21-22.
[25]. Woods, S.L., Froelicher, E.S.S., Motzer, S.U., & Bridges, E.J. (2005). Cardiac Nursing. 5th Ed., Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, pp. 386-392.
[26]. Yilmaz, E., Gurgun, C., & Dramali, A. (2007). “Minimizing short-term complications in patients who have undergone cardiac invasive procedure: A Randomized Controlled Trial involving position change and sandbag”. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg, Vol. 7, No. 4 , pp. 390- 396.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.