Developing Quality Strategy Using a Composite Approach

R. Jagadeesh*
*Professor of production and operations Management SDM Institute for Management Development, Mysore.
Periodicity:June - August'2006
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jmgt.1.1.427

Abstract

While developing products and services which are the intended outputs from the organizations, the crucial issue is to decide the appropriate quality level at which those outputs need to be offered. This is because the cost aspects as well as the marketability of the outputs are dependent on the quality of the output and governed by various internal and external forces. Also, the manner in which the quality standards need to be raised over a period of time to meet rising competition is equally important considering the strategic value of quality. This demands a holistic approach to quality planning with a strategic perspective. While strategy formulation pertaining to the conventional areas like finance or marketing, are well conceivable based on success models, formulation of quality strategy is still to be standardized. In this paper planning for quality in a strategic perspective is discussed which advocates the use of a composite approach relying on certain models and concepts. The proposed composite approach links the quality-cost relation, product life cycle, and quality expectation from market view with product quality in terms of eight dimensions of quality. This also facilitates a carefully planned continuous quality improvement cycle. The methodology involves a step-wise approach. The applications and also the merits and limitations of the approach are discussed.

Keywords

How to Cite this Article?

R. Jagadeesh (2006). Developing Quality Strategy Using a Composite Approach. i-manager’s Journal on Management, 1(1), 52-58. https://doi.org/10.26634/jmgt.1.1.427

References

1. Belohlav, J.A. (1993) "Qual i ty, St rategy and Competitiveness", California Management Review, Volume 35, Number 3, pp 55-67.
2. Garvin, D. (1987) "Competing on the Eight Dimensions of Quality", Harvard Business Review, November-December, pp.l0l-l09.
3. Gupta, Yash and Lonial, Subash. (1998) "Exploring Linkages between manufacturing Strategy, Business Strategy and Organizational Strategy", International Journal of Production and Operations Management Volume 7, Number 3, pp 243-364.
4. Harfield, Toby. (1998) "Strategic Management and Michael Porter: A Postmodern Reading", Electronic Journal of Radical Organization Theory, Volume 4, Number 1.
5. Haworth, R. (1991) "Quality and cost Improvements", International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, Volume 8, Number 3, pp 21-29.
6. Hoskinsson, Robert, Hilt, Michael, and Ireland, Duane. (2004) "Competing for Advantage", Thomson Learning, USA.
7. Leggitt, Mark and Anderson, Rhonda. (2001) "Linking Strategic and Quality Plans”, Quality Progress, October 2001, pp 61-63.
8. Lenane, Dean-Michael. (1986) "Accounting for the Real Cost of Quality", Quality Progress, January, 1986, pp 22- 27.
9. McConhie,James and Roth, Evan.(1998)"Cost of Quality-The Payback", Paul Hertzler and Co, USA., pp 1-3.
10. Porter, Michael. (1980) "Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors", New York: Free Press
11. Powell, T. C. (1995) "TQM as Competitive Advantage; A Review and Empirical Study", Strategic Management Journal, Volume 16, Number 1, pp 15-37.
12. Sower, V., 1. Duffy, W. Kilbourne, G. Kohers, & P. Jones. (2001) "The Dimensions of Service Quality for Hospitals: Development of the KQCAH Scale." Health Care Management Review, vol. 26, no. 2, Spring 2001, 47-59.
13. Warnach, Mark. (2003) "Continual Programs", Quality Progress, March 2003, pp42-47.
14. Weiler,Greg.(2004)"What do CEOs think About Quality?", Quality Progress, May 2004, pp 52-56.
15. Wilbur, Jay. (2002) "Is time running Out For Quality?", Quality Progress, July 2002, pp 75-79.
16. www.quickMBA.com
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.