Relevance of Item Analysis in Standardizing an Achievement Test in Teaching of Physical Science in B.Ed Syllabus

S. Maria Josephine Arokia Marie*, Sreekala Edannur**
* Research Scholar, School of Education, Pondicherry University, India.
** Faculty, School of Education, Pondicherry University, India.
Periodicity:October - December'2015
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.12.3.3743

Abstract

This paper focused on the analysis of test items constructed in the paper of teaching Physical Science for B.Ed. class. It involved the analysis of difficulty level and discrimination power of each test item. Item analysis allows selecting or omitting items from the test, but more importantly item an alysis is a tool to help the item writer improve an item. There were 100 objective type questions in the achievement test and was administered to a sample of 100 students from B.Ed. colleges. The result of the work showed that most of the test items fall in the acceptable range of difficulty index and discrimination index. However, 17 of the test items was excluded due to very high or very low difficulty level and poor discrimination power. Purposive sampling was adopted for this study and 100 B.Ed. Physical Science students were taken from private B.Ed. Colleges in Pondicherry, India. A test of 100 items was used for data collection. Using the findings relationship between the difficulty index of each item and the corresponding discrimination index is carried out using the Pearson correlation formula. From the analysis, it was found that item discrimination power increased with the increase in difficulty value but got decreased for very easy and very difficult test items. This work is significant for the researcher in framing test items with optimum difficulty and discrimination power. The findings also show that, most of the items were falling in the acceptable range of difficulty and discrimination level, however, some items were rejected due to their poor discrimination index.

Keywords

Test Item Analysis, Difficulty Level, Discrimination Index, Achievement Test, Test Items.

How to Cite this Article?

Marie, S.M.J.A., and Sreekala, E. (2015). Relevance of Item Analysis in Standardizing an Achievement Test in Teaching of Physical Science in B.Ed Syllabus. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology,12(3), 30-36. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.12.3.3743

References

[1]. Backhoff, E., Larrazolo, N., and Rosas, M. (2000). “The Level of Difficulty and Discrimination Power of the Basic Knowledge and Skills Examination (EXHCOBA)”. Revista Electrónicade Investigación Educativa, Vol.2 (1), pp. 1-16
[2]. Blood, D.F. and Budd, W.C. (1972). Educational Measurement and Evaluation. New York Harper and Row.
[3]. Brown and Frederick, G.,(1971). Measuring Classroom Achievement. Halt Richard and Winston, U.S.A, pp.101- 110.
[4]. Boopathiraj. C.,and Chellamani, K. (2013). “Analysis of test items on Difficulty level and Discrimination Index in the test for Research in Education”. International Journal of Social Science and Interdisciplinary Research. Vol. 2(2), pp. 189 -193.
[5]. Brown, F., (1983). Principles of Educational and Psychological Testing. Third edition, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Chapter 11.
[6]. Ebel, R.L., (1972). Essentials of Educational Measurement. 1st Edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
[7]. Gowdhaman, K., and Nachimuthu, K. (2013). “Item Analysis of History Achievement test on Difference Index (DI) in the Criterion Referenced Measurement”. Research Journal of Educational Sciences. Vol.1 (5), pp. 1-8.
[8]. Kevin, D. Crehan. (1974). “Item analysis for Teacher made Master y Tests ”. Journal of Educational Measurement. Vol.11 (4), pp. 255 – 262.
[9]. Michael, D. Beck (1974). “Achievement test Reliability as a function of pupil Response Procedures”. Journal of Educational Measurement. Vol.11 (2). pp. 109 - 114.
[10]. Muller, D., Calhoun, E., and Orling, R., (1972). “Test reliability as a function of answer sheet Mode”. Journal of Educational Measurement, Vol.9. pp. 321-324.
[11]. Suruchi, and Surender Singh Rana, (2014). “Test Item Analysis and Relationship between Difficulty level and Discrimination Index of Test items in an Achievement Test in Biology”. Indian Journal of Research. Vol.3 (6), pp. 56 – 58.
[12]. Wiersma, W., and Jurs, S. G., (1990). Educational Measurement and Testing. 2nd Edition. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon
[13]. Wood, D. A., (1960). Test Construction: Development and Interpretation of Achievement Tests. Columbus: OH: Charles E. Merrill Books.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.