Creative Thinking of University Teachers in the Age of Intellectual Capital: Is It Affected by Personality Types and Traits?

Isam Najib Al-Fuqaha*, Adnan Tobasi**
* Dean, Faculty of Administrative & Financial Sciences, Philadelphia University, Jordan
** Assistant Professor, Faculty of Arts, Philadelphia University, Jordan.
Periodicity:August - October'2015
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.9.2.3650

Abstract

This article attempts to probe the level of creative thinking of teachers at Philadelphia University in Jordan, and to define its relation with several independent demographic variables, namely age, gender, duration of experience, specialization, and personality types and traits. To accomplish this purpose, three questionnaires are administered on a randomly-chosen sample of (90) teachers at Philadelphia University, Jordan.

Findings point out that personality traits included in the study are found available in teachers of Philadelphia University at meager proportions. They can be arranged according to degree of availability in the following descending order: amiable, persevering, savvy, courageous and daring, intelligent, insightful, dynamic and active, and independent. The level of creative thinking of teachers at Philadelphia University is found to be somewhat moderate. Besides, there is no statistically significant relation between the creative thinking of teachers studied and each of the following demographic variables: gender, age, experience, and personality types. Specialization and amiability are concluded to affect the level of creative thinking: the first positively and the second adversely. The other personality traits studied are not available in proportions that considerably affect the level of creative thinking of teachers. As for personality types, they were found to be mainly Epimetheans and Apollonians. Several conclusions and recommendations concerning the teachinglearning environments and processes are outlined.

Keywords

Creativity, Creative Thinking, Personality Types, Dionysian (Artisan) Type, Epimethean (Guardian) Type, Promethean (Rational) Type, Apollonian (Idealist) Type, Transmission Pedagogy, Generative Pedagogy, Transformative Pedagogy, Teaching with Creativity, Teaching for Creativity, Connectional Intelligence.

How to Cite this Article?

Alfuqaha, I., and Tobasi , A. (2015). Creative Thinking of University Teachers in the Age of Intellectual Capital: Is It Affected by Personality Types and Traits?. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 9(2), 8-18. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.9.2.3650

References

[1]. Al-Fuqaha, Isam (2000). "Tajalliyat AlEbda' ", (in Arabic, means Revelations of Creativity), Al-Baraka Press, Amman, Jordan.
[2]. Al-Fuqaha, Isam (2014). “Pedagogy Redefined: Frameworks Of Learning Approaches Prevalent In The Current Digital Information Age”, i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 10(1), Apr-June 2013, Print ISSN 0973-0559, E-ISSN 2230-7125, pp. 36-45.
[3]. Al Rakhawi, Yahya (1991). " The Aggression Energy", Ebda' Journal (in Arabic), 9th. year, Cairo: Egypt, pp. 50 - 66.
[4]. Craft, A. (1999). Creative development in the Early Years: Implications of Policy for Practice, The Curriculum Journal, Vol.10(1), pp.135–150.
[5]. Dhawan, Erica & Joni, Saj-Nicole ( 2015). Get Big Things Done: The Power of Connectional Intelligence, Palgrave Macmillan, USA, ISBN 978-1-137-27978-1, p.9-7.
[6]. Keirsey, David (1998). Please Understand Me II: Temperament, Character, Intelligence. Amazon Pub., ISBN-13: 978-1885705020
[7]. Mitra, Sugara (2010). The Child Driven Education, TED. http://www.ted.com/talks/sugara_mitra_the_child_driven _education/transcript?language=en.
[8]. Morris. Wayne (2006). Creativity: Its Place in Education, Future Edge Ltd, New Zealand.
[9]. Ruggiero, V. (1988). The Art of Thinking, 2 nd. ed., New York: Harper & Row Pub., USA, pp.2-33.
[10]. Stein, M. (1975). " Creativity and Culture", Journal of Psychology, Vol. XXXVI, pp. 311 - 328.
[11]. Sternberg, R. (2003). Wisdom, Intelligence, and Creativity Synthesized, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
[12]. Taylor, C. (1972). " Creativity: Progress and Potential", in Stroycock (ed.) Educational Psychology, Canada: The Copper Book Publishing Co., pp. 53 - 55.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.