Cognitive Versus Learning Styles: Emergence of the Ideal Education Model (IEM)

Mohammad Ali Salmani Nodoushan*
Senior Researcher, Iranian Institute for Encyclopedia Research
DOI : https://doi.org/

Abstract

Societies have striven through centuries to develop educational systems that would foster the most idealistic educational outcomes among learners. A brief overview of the existing body of knowledge on this issue shows the recurring patterns of underachievement and the growing rates of student drop-outs which have motivated psychologists and educators to attempt at a pathological examination of the causes of student failure, and models of learning and cognitive styles which were proposed as possible explanation. The aim of this paper is to briefly review some of the most influential models and to draw readers' attention to inherent shortcomings of the models. The methodology used for this study was library research, where the author took notes to gather the data needed for this paper. After a brief review of the existing models, the paper proposes a more comprehensive model, which is called the Ideal Education Model (IEM) and recommends it as an alternative to the existing models.

Keywords

Cognitive Style, Thinking, Visual, Imaginal, Learning style, Democratic Education.

How to Cite this Article?

Nodoushan, M. A. S. (2014). Cognitive Versus Learning Styles: Emergence of the Ideal Education Model (IEM). i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 8(2) ,31-39.

References

[1]. Altun, A., & Cakan, M. (2006). Undergraduate students' academic achievement, field dependentindependent cognitive styles and attitude toward computers. Educational Technology and Society, 9(1), pp.289-297.
[2]. Ausubel, D. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Grune & Stratton.
[3]. Bouchard, T. J. (1999). Genes, environment, and personality. In S. J. Ceci, & W. M. Williams (Eds.), The naturenurture debate: The essential readings (pp. 97-103). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
[4]. Briggs, K. C., & Myers, I. B. (1962/1998). Myers-Briggs type indicator (form M). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
[5]. Brown, H.D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching (4th ed). White Plains, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
[6]. Cattell, R. B. (1966). Personality structure: The larger dimensions. In B. Simeonoff (Ed.), Personality assessment. Baltimore: Penguin.
[7]. Conner, M. L., & Hodgins, W. (2000). Learning Styles. Retrieved from the Internet on (April 20, 2011): http://www.learnativity.com/learningstyles.html
[8]. Davis, J. K., & Cochran, K. F. (1989). An information processing view of field dependence-independence. Early Child Development and Care, Vol.51, pp.31-47.
[9]. Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[10]. Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1992). Teaching elementary student through their individual learning styles. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
[11]. Felder, R., & Silverman, L. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), pp.674-681.
[12]. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
[13]. Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed. New York: Basic Books
[14]. Goldstein, K., & Blackman, S. (1978). Cognitive style. New York: Wiley.
[15]. Gregorc, A. F., & Butler, K. A. (1984). Learning is a matter of style. Vocational Education Journal, 59 (3), pp.27-29.
[16]. Hayes, J., & Allinson, C. W. (1998). Cognitive style and the theory and practice of individual and collective learning in organizations. Human Relations, Vol.51, pp.847-871.
[17]. Honey, P., & Mumford, A. (1986). The Manual of Learning Styles. Maidenhead. Kent: Peter Honey Publications Ltd.
[18]. Jackson, C. J. (2009). Using the hybrid model of learning in personality to predict performance in the workplace. 8th IOP Conference, Conference Proceedings, Manly, Sydney, Australia, 25-28 June, 2009 pp 75-79.
[19]. Jarvis, M. (2005). The psychology of effective learning and teaching. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes Ltd
[20]. Jonassen, D. H. & Grabowski, B. L. (1993). Handbook of individual differences, learning and instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[21]. Jones, S. (1998). Learning styles and learning strategies: Towards learner independence. Forum for Modern Language Studies, 34(2), pp.114-129.
[22]. Jung, C. G. (1933). Modern Man In Search of A Soul. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
[23]. Jung, C. G. (1933). Psychological Types. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
[24]. Kahtz, A. W., & Kling, G. J. (1999). Field-dependent and field-independent conceptualization of various instructional methods with an emphasis on CAI: A qualitative analysis. Educational Psychology, Vol.19, pp.413-428.
[25]. Keefe, J. W. (1979). Learning style: An overview. In J. W. Keefe (Ed.), Student learning styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs (pp. 1-17). Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary School Principals.
[26]. Kolb D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
[27]. Ku, D. T., & Soulier, J. S. (2009). The effects of learning goals on learning performance of field-dependent and field-independent late adolescents in a hypertext environment. Adolescence, Vol.44, pp.651-664.
[28]. Ling, C., & Salvendy, G. (2009). Effect of evaluators' cognitive style on heuristic evaluation: Field dependent and field independent evaluators. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies,Vol. 67, pp.382-393.
[29]. Mcgue, M., Bouchard, T. J., Jr., Iacono, W. G, & Iykken, D. T. (1993). Behavioral genetics of cognitive ability: A life-span perspective. In R. Plomin & G. E. Mcclearn (Eds.), Nature, nurture, and psychology (pp. 59- 76). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
[30]. O'leary, M. R., Calsyn, D. A., & Fauria, T. (1980). The group embedded figures test: A measure of cognitive style or cognitive impairment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 44(5), 532-537.
[31]. Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge.
[32]. Riding, R. J. (2002). On the assessment of cognitive style: A commentary on Peterson, Deary and Austin. Personality and Individual Differences, 33.
[33]. Riding, R. J., & Rayner, S. (1998). Cognitive styles and learning strategies. London: David Fulton Publish.
[34]. Riechmann, S. W. & Grasha, A. F. (1974). A rational approach to developing and assessing the construct validity of a student learning style scales instrument. The Journal of Psychology, Vol.87, pp.213-223.
[35]. Salmani Nodoushan, M. A. (2007). Is field dependence or independence a predictor of EFL reading performance? TESL Canada Journal, 24(2), pp.82-108.
[36]. Saracho, O. N. (2001). Cognitive style and kindergarten pupils' preferences for teachers. Learning and Instruction, Vol.11, pp.195-209.
[37]. Schmeck, R. R., & Grove, E. (1979). Academic achievement and individual differences in learning processes. Applied Psychological Measurement, 3, pp.43-49.
[38]. Siadaty, M., & Taghiyareh, F. (2006). Bridging the gap between pedagogy technology in e-learning environments. In Proceedings of International Conference on Science and technology (ICSTIE2006): Applications in Industry and Education, Malaysia.
[39]. Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Thinking styles. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[40]. Stewart, K. L., & Felicetti, L. A. (1992). Learning styles of marketing majors. Educational Research Quarterly, 15(2), pp.15-23.
[41]. Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & Cox, P. W. (1977). Field-dependent and fieldindependent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47(1), pp.1-64.
[42]. Witkin, H. A., Oltman, P. K., Raskin, E., & Karp, S. A. (1971). A Manual for the Group Embedded Figures Test. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article
Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

USD EUR INR
Print 35 35 200
Online 35 35 200
Print & Online 35 35 400