References
[1]. Ball, D.L. (2002). What do we believe about teacher
learning and how can we learn with and from our beliefs.
Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Meeting of the
North American Chapter of the International Group for the
Psychology of Mathematics Education. Athens, Georgia, 1,
3-19
[2]. Ball, D.L. (1991). Research on teaching mathematics:
Making subject matter part of the equation. In J. Brophy
(Ed.), Advances in research on teaching. Vol. 2, (pp. 1-48),
Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
[3]. Ball, D.L. (1988). The subject matter preparation of
prospective mathematics teachers: Challenging the
myths. National Center for Research on Teacher
Education: Michigan State University.
[4]. Ball, D.L., & McDiarmid, G.W. (1990). The subject matter
preparation of teachers. In W.R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook for Research on Teacher Education (pp.437-449), New
York: Macmillan.
[5]. Berenson, S., Cavey, L., Clark, M., & Staley, K. (2001).
Adapting Pirie and Kieren's model of mathematical
understanding to teacher preparation. Proceedings of the
Twenty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the International Group for
the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Utrecht, NL:
Fruedenthal Institute, 2. 137-144.
[6]. Borko, H., & Putnam, R.T. (1996). Learning to teach. In
D.C. Berliner & R.C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of Educational
Psychology (pp. 673-708). New York: Simon and Schuster
Macmillan.
[7]. Grossman, P.L., Wilson, S.M., & Shulman, L.S. (1989).
Teachers of substance: Subject matter knowledge for
teaching. In M.C. Reynolds (Ed.), Knowledge base for the
beginning teacher (pp. 23-36). New York: Pergamon.
[8]. Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of
Mathematical Discovery. New York: Cambridge University
Press.
[9]. Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary
mathematics: Teachers' understanding of fundamental
mathematics in China and the U.S. New Jersey.
[10]. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1991).
Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston,
VA.
[11]. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2000).
Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston,
VA.
[12]. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2010).
Mathematics teaching in the middle school. Reston, VA.
[13]. National Governors Association Center for Best
Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers[NGACBP & CCSSO]. (2010). Common Core State
Standards for Mathematics. Washington, DC: Authors.
[14]. Osler, J. E. (2012). Trichotomy–Squared – A Novel
Mixed Methods Test and Research Procedure Designed to
Analyze, Transform, and Compare Qualitative and
Quantitative Data for Education Scientists who are
Administrators, Practitioners, Teachers, and Technologists.
July–September i-manager Journal on Mathematics, 1 (3),
pp. 23–31.
[15]. Pirie, S. & Kieren, T. (1994). Growth in mathematical
understanding: How can we characterize it and how can
we represent it? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26 (2-
3), 165-190.
[16]. Schoenfeld, A. (1999). Looking toward the 21st
century: Challenges of educational theory and practice,
Educational Researcher, 28(7), 4-14.
[17]. Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand:
Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher,
15(2), 4-14.
[18]. Stigler, J.& Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best
ideas from the world's teachers for improving education in
the classroom. New York: Summit Books.
