Degree of Hybridity: Peer Review in the Blended Composition Classroom

Rebecca Helminen Middlebrook*
Writing (Communication) Coach/ Instructor, Michigan Technological University, Department of Cognitive and Learning Sciences, Houghton.
Periodicity:April - June'2013
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.10.1.2299

Abstract

As the move to increase availability of composition courses in the online environment continues, it is important to understand the ways in which composition instructors take on the challenges associated with moving their teaching online and how they modify, or re-mediate, their pedagogy for this new teaching and learning environment. By investigating the views composition instructors hold regarding technology use in their teaching practices, factors that may influence the degree of re-mediation of pedagogical practices seen in hybrid, or blended, first-year composition courses were identified. One factor in particular that had a great effect on the degree of pedagogical re-mediation in this study was identified and defined as degree of hybridity.

Keywords

Hybrid Courses, Blended Learning, Peer Review, Composition, Pedagogy, Curricula Development, Degree of Hybridity.

How to Cite this Article?

Middlebrook , R. H. (2013). Degree Of Hybridity: Peer Review In The Blended Composition Classroom. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 10(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.10.1.2299

References

[1]. Allen, I. E., Seaman, J., & Garrett, R. (2009). “Blending In: The Extent and Promise of Blended Education in the United States.” The Sloan Consortium. Retrieved from web January 27.
[2]. Berlin, J. (1982). “Contemporary Composition: The Major Pedagogical Theories.” College English, 44.8: p. 765-77.
[3]. Bliuc, A., Goodyear, P.& Ellis, R.A. (2007). “Research Focus and Methodological Choices in Studies into Students' Experiences of Blended Learning in Higher Education.” Internet and Higher Education, 10: p. 231-244.
[4]. Bolter, J. D. & Grusin, R. (2000). Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
[5]. Bruffee, K. A. (1984). “Collaboration and the 'Conversation of Mankind.'” College English. 46: 635-52.
[6]. “Course Delivery Modalities.” (2009). Center for Distributed Learning. University of Central Florida. Retrieved from web February 15, 2009.
[7]. DiPardo, A., & Freedman S. (1988). “Peer Response Groups in the Writing Classrooms: Theoretic Foundations and New Directions.” Review of Educational Research. 58:2: 119-49.
[8]. Draper, S., Brown, J. M., Henderson, F., & McAteer, E. (1996). “Integrative Evaluation: An Emerging Role for Classroom Studies of CAL.” Computers and Education, 26(1-3): 17-31.
[9]. Erdosne Toth, E., Morrow, B., & Ludvico, L. (2009). “Designing Blended Inquiry Learning in a Laboratory Context: A Study of Incorporating Hands-On and Virtual Laboratories.” Innovative Higher Education, 33(5): 333-344.
[10]. Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). “Blended Learning: Uncovering its Transformative Potential in Higher Education.” Internet and higher Education, 7: 95-105.
[11]. Ginns, P., & Ellis, R. A. (2009). “Evaluating the Quality of E-learning at the Degree Level in the Student Experience of Blended Learning.” British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(4):652-663.
[12]. Graham, C. R. (2006). “Blended Learning Systems: Definitions, Current Trends and Future Directions.” In Bonk, Curtis J. and Charles R. Graham, eds. The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs. San Francisco: Wiley. 3-21.
[13]. Hawisher, G. E., & Selfe, C. L. (1991). “The Rhetoric of Technology and the Electronic Writing Class.” College Composition and Communication 42, 1: 55-65.
[14]. Hwang, A. & Arbaugh, J.B. (2009). “Seeking Feedback in Blended Learning: Competitive Versus Cooperative Student Attitudes and their Links to Learning Outcome.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(3): 280-293.
[15]. Ireland, J., Martindale, S., Johnson, N., Adams, D., Eboh, W., & Mowatt, E. (2009). “Blended Learning in Education: Effects on Knowledge and Attitude.” British Journal of Nursing, 18(2): 124-130.
[16]. Kastman Breuch, L. (2004). Virtual Peer Review: Teaching and Learning about Writing in Online Environments. Albany: State University of New York Press.
[17]. Khine, M.S. & Lourdusamy, A. (2003). “Blended Learning Approach in Teacher Education: Combining face-to-face Instruction, Multi-media Viewing and On-line Discussion.” British Journal of Education Technology, 34(5: 671-675.
[18]. Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). “Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication.” London: Edward Arnold Press.
[19]. McLuhan, M. (2005). The Medium is the Message. Ginko Press.
[20]. Moran, C. (2001). “Technology and the Teaching of Writing.” In Tate, Gary, Amy Rupiper, and Kurt Schick, eds., A Guide to Composition Pedagogies. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 203-223.
[21]. Motteram, G. (2006). “'Blended' Education and the Transformation of Teachers: A Long-term Case Study in Postgraduate UK Higher Education.” British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(1): 17-30.
[22]. Murray, D. M. (2003). “Teach Writing as a Process Not Product.” In Villanueva, Victor, ed., Cross-Talk in Comp Theory. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
[23]. Oliver, M., & Trigwell, K. (2005). “Can 'Blended Learning' Be Redeemed?” E-Learning, 2(1): 17-26.
[24]. Roblyer, M.D., & Doering, A. (2013). Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching. 6th Edn. Boston, Allyn Bacon.
[25]. Skill, T. D., & Young, B. A. (2002). “Embracing the Hybrid Model: Working at the Intersection of Virtual and Physical Learning Spaces.” New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 92: 23-32.
[26]. “The Sloan Consortium.” (2009). Retrieved from web July 1, 2009.
[27]. Tabor, S. W. (2007). “Narrowing the distance; Implementing a Hybrid Learning Model for Information Security Education.” The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8:1: 47-57.
[28]. Tuzi, F. (2004). “The Impact of E-feedback on the Revisions of L2 Writers in an Academic Writing Course.” Computers and Composition 21: 217-235.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.