Lexical cohesion in students’ argumentative essay among a select group of Filipino college students

Josephine B. Alarcon*
* University of SantoTomas Research Cluster for Culture, Education and Social Issues.
Periodicity:April - June'2013
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.3.2.2298

Abstract

This study analyzed the lexical devices used by undergraduate students in their argumentative text using Halliday and Hasan (1976) and Halliday(2004) taxonomy.One hundred forty-eight argumentative essays were analyzed. The essays underwent interrating by three independent raters using a 20-point rubric and were grouped according to rating. Repetition was the most frequently used lexical cohesive device among the three groups of essays. Antonyms, meronyms, and hyponyms followed respectively. Superordinates and collocation occurred less frequently in the essays. There was a low correlation between the frequency of lexical devices and writing quality. Therefore, there was no significant relationship between lexical cohesive devices and writing quality.times new roman Qualitative findings reveal that synonyms in the highly-rated essays were utilized by the students to denote the positive effects and to define technology. Antonyms were used for comparison and contrast and to denote the positive effects of technology in the low-rated essays. Unlike in the highly-rated essays where synonyms were used to give positive effects of technology, antonyms were used to denote positive effects of technology in the low-rated essays to achieve such communicative purpose. Other lexical devices assisted the students in fulfilling their writing requirement. Hyponyms were employed to explain how a particular concept contributes to or is a part of a bigger concept. Meronyms were used to give examples of a concept and to define a term. Superordinates were utilized to give a specific kind or brand of a more general idea.

Keywords

cohesion, lexical, Frequency.

How to Cite this Article?

Alarcon, B. J. (2013). Lexical Cohesion In Students' Argumentative Essay Among A Select Group Of Filipino College Students. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 3(2), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.3.2.2298

References

[1]. Allard, L. & Ulatowska, H. (1991). Cohesion in written and procedural discourse of fifth-grade children. Linguistics and Education, 3 (1), 63-79. Retrieved from www.sciencedirect.com on July 24, 2010.
[2]. Brashi, A. (2009). Collocability as a problem in L2 production. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 8 (1), .22-23.
[3]. Carell, P. (1982). Cohesion is not coherence. TESOL Quarterly, 16(4).
[4]. Castro, C. (2004). Cohesion and social construction of meaning in L2. Asia Pacific Education Review, 5 (2), 215-225. Retrieved from www.sciencedirect.com on October 27, 2012.
[5]. Chen, H. & Yu, H. (2002). An analysis of lexical cohesion in high school students' compositions. Retrieved from http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.twon October 29, 2010.
[6]. Chen, J. (2008). An investigation of EFL students' use of cohesive devices. Retrieved from nutnr.lib.nutn.edu.tw on August 18, 2010.
[7]. Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
[8]. Halkiday M.A.K. And Hasan, R. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.
[9]. Hoey, M. (1991). Patterns of lexis in text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[10]. Jin, W. (2001). A quantitative study of cohesion in Chinese graduate students' writing: Variations across genres and proficiency levels. Research Report no.143.
[11]. Khalil, A. (1989). A study of cohesion and coherence in Arab EFL college students writing. System. 17, (3), 359-371. Retrieved from www.sciencedirect.com on July 24.
[12]. Liu, D. (2000). Writing cohesion: Using context lexical ties in ESOL. English Teaching Forum, 38(1), 28-33.
[13]. Mojica, L. (2006). Reiterations in ESL learners' academic papers: do they contribute to lexical cohesiveness? The Asia-Pacific Education Research, 15(1), 105-125.
[14]. Tierney, R & Mosenthal, J (1981). The Cohesion concept' relationship to the coherence of text. Center for Study for reading technical report 221. University of IllinoisUrbana-Champaign
[15]. Witte, S. and Faigley, L. (1981). Coherence, cohesion, and writing quality. College Composition and Communication, 32(2), 189-204.
[16]. Zhang, A. (2005). Use of Cohesive Ties in Relation to the Quality of Compositions by Chinese College Students. Journal of Cambridge Studies, 5 (2-3), 78-86.
[17]. Zhou, X.(2007). Application of English cohesion theory in the teaching of writing to Chinese graduate students US-China Education Review, 4 (7), 31-37.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.