i-manager Publications

The effects of Semantic mapping, thematic clustering, and notebook keeping on L2 vocabulary recognition and production

Abbas Ali Zarei*, Saba Adami**

* Assistant Professor, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin.

** M.A. Islamic Azad University, Takestan.

Periodicity:April - June'2013
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.3.2.2295

Abstract

To investigate the effects of semantic mapping, thematic clustering, and notebook keeping on L2 vocabulary recognition and production, four groups of intermediate level learners in an EFL institute in Zanjan, Iran participated in the study. Three experimental groups consisted of semantic mapping, semantic feature analysis, and vocabulary notebook keeping. The fourth group served as the comparison group. During the treatment, the participants of the four groups were presented with the same vocabulary items but using different techniques. At the end of the experimental period, a multiple choice and a fill-in the-blanks posttest were administered. Data were analysed using two separate one-way ANOVA procedures. Results indicated that all three experimental conditions were more effective than the comparison condition on both vocabulary recognition and production. It also turned out that semantic feature analysis and vocabulary notebook keeping techniques were more effective than semantic mapping on Iranian EFL learners vocabulary recognition. Results also showed that semantic feature analysis was more effective than semantic mapping, which in turn, was more effective than vocabulary notebook keeping on Iranian EFL learners’ vocabulary production.

Keywords

semantic mapping, thematic clustering, notebook keeping, vocabulary recognition, vocabulary production.

How to Cite this Article?

Zarei, A. A., and Adami, S. (2013). The Effects Of Semantic Mapping, Thematic Clustering, And Notebook Keeping On L2 Vocabulary Recognition And Production. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 3(2), 17-27. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.3.2.2295

References

[1]. Barcroft, J. (2002). Semantic and structural elaboration in L2 lexical acquisition. Language Learning, 52 (2), 323-363.

[2]. Barcroft, J. (2009). Strategies and performance in intentional L2 vocabulary learning. Language awareness, 18 (1), 74-89.

[3]. Bromley, K. (2007). Nine things every teacher should know about words and vocabulary instruction. Journal of adolescence and adult literacy, 50 (7), 528-537.

[4]. Chu-chang, M., Johnson, D. D., Pittelman, S. D., & Toms-bronowski, S. (1982). Studies of vocabulary development in the United States of America and the Republic of China. ERIC document reproduction service, No. ED227679. Retrieved October 19, 2010 from http:// www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/recordDetail?Accno =Ed227679

[5]. Codesal, M. M. (2000). Learner centredness in vocabulary learning. Encuentro, Revista de Investigacion e Innovacion en la clase de idioms, 11, 174-183.

[6]. Cunningham, P. M. (1979). Teaching vocabulary in the content areas. NASSP Bulletin, 63, 112-116.

[7]. Fowle, C. (2002). Vocabulary notebook: Implementation and outcomes. ELT Journal, 56 (4), 380-388.

[8]. Gowdasiei, F., & Hashemi, M. R. (2005). An attribute- treatment interaction study: lexical set versus semantically unrelated vocabulary instruction. RELC Journal, 36 (3), 341-361.

[9]. Graves, M. F. (1986). Vocabulary learning and instruction. Review of Research in Education, 13, 49-89.

[10]. Hippner- page, T. (2000). Semantic clustering versus thematic clustering of English vocabulary words for second language instruction: which method is more effective? ERIC, document reproduction service, No. Ed315962.

[11]. Jia, S. (2006). An empirical research on learning strategies training in EFL classroom. US-China foreign language, 4 (5), 54-59.

[12]. Jiang, N. (2002). From-meaning mapping in vocabulary acquisition in a second language. SSLA, 24, 617-637.

[13]. Johnson, D. D., & Pittelman, S. D. (1985). Project on the investigation of the effectiveness of vocabulary instruction. ERIC, document reproduction service, No. Ed276988.

[14]. Johnson, D. D., Levin, K.M., & Pittelman, S. D. (1985). An investigation of two instructional settings in the use of semantic mapping with poor readers. Madison, Wisc.: Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin.

[15]. Johnson, D.D., Levin, K.M., Pittelman, S. D., & Toms-bronowski, S. (1984). An investigation of the effects of prior knowledge and vocabulary acquisition on passage comprehension. ERIC, document reproduction service No. Ed254830.

[16]. Leeke, P., & Shaw, P. (2000). Learners' independent records of vocabulary. System, 28(2), 271-289.

[17]. Moir, J., & Nation, I. S. P. (2002). Learners' use of strategy for effective vocabulary learning. Prospect, 17 (1), 15-35.

[18]. Margosein, C. M., Pascarella, E. T., & Pflaum, S. W. (1982). The effect of instruction using semantic mapping on vocabulary and comprehension. The Journal of early adolescence, 2(2), 185-194.

[19]. Riazi, A., Sadighi, F., & Zare, S. (2005). The effect of EFL students' L2 proficiency and age on their overall patterns of vocabulary. IJAL, 8 (2), 87-106.

[20]. Sanchez, M. J. (2004). Effect of instruction with expert patterns on the lexical Learning of English as a foreign language. System, 32(1), 89-102.

[21]. Schmitt, N. (2008). Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language teaching research, 12 (3), 329-363.

[22]. Shapiro, A. M., & Waters, D. L. (2005). An investigation of the cognitive processes underlying the key word method of foreign vocabulary learning. Language teaching research, 9 (2), 129-146.

[23]. Tinkham, T. (1997). The effect of semantic and thematic clustering on the learning of second language vocabulary. Second language research, 13 (2), 138-163.

[24]. Waring, R. (1997). The negative effects of learning words in semantic sets: A replication. System, 25 (2), 261-274.

The effects of Semantic mapping, thematic clustering, and notebook keeping on L2 vocabulary recognition and production

Abstract

Keywords

How to Cite this Article?

References

If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Options for accessing this content:

	North Americas,UK, Middle East,Europe		India	Rest of world
	USD	EUR	INR	USD-ROW
Pdf	35	35	200	20
Online	35	35	200	15
Pdf & Online	35	35	400	25