Metatext in results-and-discussion sections of ESL/EFL research: A contrastive analysis of Philippine English,Taiwanese English, and Iranian English

Veronico N. Tarrayo*
*University of Santo Tomas Graduate School.
Periodicity:July - September'2011
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.1.3.1594

Abstract

This paper looked into the interplay between language and culture based on the metatext categories utilized by the writers in three speech communities: Philippines, Iran, and Taiwan.  Specifically, it answered the following subproblems: (1) What metatext categories exist in the results-and-discussion section of ESL/EFL research articles written in Philippine English, Iranian English, and Taiwanese English?; (2) At what points are the metatext categories in the three speech communities parallel or contrasting?; and (3) What cultural features are revealed by the use of metatext categories in the three Asian Englishes?

Data analyzed were the results-and-discussion sections of 15 research articles (RAs): ESL RAs representing the Philippine-English variety were published in the TESOL Journal in 2009, and EFL RAs representing both the Taiwanese-English and Iranian-English varieties were from the Asian EFL Journal published in 2008 and 2009.  Two inter-raters helped in the coding of metatext categories in the genre examined and in the validation of the data gathered.  Frequency and percentage counts were employed to examine the corpus.

Results revealed that the relative frequency of preview and review categories was highest in Philippine English RAs than in Taiwanese English RAs and Iranian English RAs.  In the three Asian Englishes, the number of previews was larger than the number of reviews.  With regard to the use of connectors, all three Englishes were built on the additive cohesive relation.  Further, they used both simple connectors, such as and, but, though, and yet and their complex alternatives, such as furthermore, on the other hand, in a similar vein, and in a similar sense - a preference for a more elaborate and a change-oriented rhetorical pattern.  In addition, Philippine English had the most number of action markers, thus, implying the Philippine English’s tendency to be more writer-responsible as compared with the Taiwanese English and Iranian English.

Keywords

Asian Englishes, contrastive rhetoric, culture, metatext, research articles, writing.

How to Cite this Article?

Tarrayo, N. T. (2011). Metatext In Results-And-Discussion Sections Of ESL/EFL Research: A Contrastive Analysis Of Philippine English, Taiwanese English, And Iranian English. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 1(3), 39-52. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.1.3.1594

References

[1]. Bautista, M. L. S. (1998a). Another look at Tagalog-English code-switching. In M. L. S. Bautista (Ed.). Pagtanaw: Essays on language in honor of Teodoro A Llamzon (pp. 121-146). Manila: The Linguistic Society of the Philippines.
[2]. Bernardo, A. B. I. (1999). Overcoming obstacles to understanding and solving word problems in Mathematics. Educational Psychology, 19(2), 149-163.
[3]. Bulter, J. M. & Turbill, J. (1984). Toward a reading-writing classroom. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
[4]. Connor, U., Nagelhout, E., & Rozycki, W. (2008). Contrastive rhetoric – Reaching to intercultural rhetoric. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
[5]. Dahl, T. (2004). Textual metadiscourse in research articles: A marker of national culture or of academic discipline? Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1807–1825.
[6]. Dayag, D. T. (2009). Metadiscourse, argumentation, and Asian Englishes. Manila; UST Publishing House.
[7]. Genuino, C. F. (2002). Cohesion: A revelation of cultural practices. Philippine Journal of Linguistics, 33(2), 1-18.
[8]. Gonzales, S. D. (2002). Politeness in letters to the editor in Philippine English, American English, and Singaporean English. Philippine Journal of Linguistics, 33(2), 19-37.
[9]. Gustilo, L. E. (2002). A contrastive analysis of American English and Philippine English news leads. Philippine Journal of Linguistics, 33(2), 53-66.
[10]. Halliday, M. A. K. (1973). Explorations in the functions of language. London: Edward Arnold.
[11]. Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
[12]. Hinds, J. (1987). Reader versus writer responsibility: A new typology. In U. Connor & R. B. Kaplan (Eds.), Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 texts (pp. 141–152). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
[13]. Kachru, Y. (1999). Culture, context, and writing. In E. Hinkel (ed.), Culture in second language teaching and learning (pp. 75-89). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[14]. Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Oxford: Blackwell.
[15]. Madrunio, M. (2004). The linguistic features of complaint letters to editors in Philippine English and Singapore English. Asian Englishes 7(2), 52-73.
[16]. Mauranen, A. (1993). Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Finnish–English economics texts. English for Specific Purposes 12, 3–22.
[17]. Mohamed, A. & Omer, M. (2000). Texture and culture: Cohesion as a marker of rhetorical organization in Arabic and English narrative texts. RELC Journal, 31(2), 45-75.
[18]. Noyce, R.M. & Christie, J.F. (1989). Integrating reading and writing instruction in grades K-8. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
[19]. Ortega, L. (1999). Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 108-148.
[20]. Rashidi, N. & Souzandehfar M. (2010). Text-organizing metatext in research articles: An English-Persian contrastive analysis. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language Journal, 13(4). Retrieved from http:// www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/ volume13/ ej52/ej52a10/.
[21]. Williams, J. (2001). Learner-generated attention to form. Language Learning, 51, 303-346.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.