i-manager Publications

Integrated Usability Evaluation Framework for University Websites

Solomon A. Adepoju*, Ishaq O. Oyefolahan**, Muhammad B. Abdullahi***, Adamu A. Mohammed****

*,***Department of Computer Science, Federal University of Technology, Minna, Nigeria.

**Department of Information and Media Technology, Federal University of Technology, Minna, Nigeria.

****Department of Mathematics and Applied Science, Federal University of Technology, Minna, Nigeria.

Periodicity:December - February'2019
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jit.8.1.15713

Abstract

The importance of usability of websites in this contemporary era of information communication by universities and other allied academic institutions worldwide is very crucial. This has necessitated the urge and drive for usable websites to be developed by these institutions in order to improve ease of use. However, the need to measure usability of websites effectively have also prompted many researchers to develop different usability evaluation model. Even though there are numerous research efforts in this direction, there is still no universally acceptable usability evaluation model. In this paper, a framework based on integration of a Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) approach with an artificial intelligence technique is being proposed to effectively evaluate university websites usability. The criteria used are; speed, navigation, ease of use, content, accessibility, aesthetic, and security. Thus a new model incorporating fuzzy analytical processing with artificial neural network is proposed.

Keywords

Fuzzy AHP, ANN, Usability, University Website, Website Evaluation.

How to Cite this Article?

Adepoju, S. A., Oyefolahan, I. O., Abdullahi, M. B., Mohammed, A. A(2019) Integrated Usability Evaluation Framework For University Websites, i-manager's Journal on Information Technology, 8(1), 40-48. https://doi.org/10.26634/jit.8.1.15713

References

[1]. Abdallah, S., & Jaleel, B. (2015). Website appeal: Development of an assessment tool and evaluation framework of e-marketing. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 10(3), 45-62.

[2]. Adepoju, S. A., & Shehu, I. S. (2014, September). Usability evaluation of academic websites using automated tools. In User Science and Engineering (i-USEr), 2014 3^rd International Conference on (pp. 186- 191). IEEE.

[3]. Ağırgün, B. (2012). Ranking B2C web sites with AHP and TOPSIS under fuzzy environment. Nevşehir Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 1(2).

[4]. Amanatiadis, A., Mitsinis, N., & Maditinos, D. (2015). A neural network-based approach for user experience assessment. Behaviour & Information Technology, 34(3), 304-315.

[5]. Aziz, N. S., & Kamaludin, A. (2015, August). Using pretest to validate the Questionnaire for Website Usability (QWU). In Software Engineering and Computer Systems (ICSECS), 2015 4^th International Conference on (pp. 107- 111). IEEE.

[6]. Botella, P., Burgués, X., Carvallo, J. P., Franch, X., Grau, G., Marco, J., & Quer, C. (2004, January). ISO/IEC 9126 in practice: What do we need to know. In Software Measurement European Forum (Vol. 2004).

[7]. Delice, E. K., & Güngör, Z. (2009). The usability analysis with heuristic evaluation and analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 39(6), 934- 939.

[8]. Devi, K., & Sharma, A. K. (2016a). Evaluating the Quality of Academic Websites using proposed framework – a survey study. International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology, 40(1), 25-30.

[9]. Devi, K., & Sharma, A. K. (2016b). Framework for evaluation of academic website. International Journal of Computer Techniques, 3(2), 234-239.

[10]. Djordjevic, N. D., Rancic, D. D., & Vulic, I. (2013, October). The relative importance of the usability factors for web portals. In Telecommunication in Modern Satellite, Cable and Broadcasting Services (TELSIKS), 2013 11^th International Conference on (Vol. 2, pp. 571-574). IEEE.

[11]. Dominic, P. D. D., & Jati, H. (2010, June). Evaluation method of malaysian university website: Quality website using hybrid method. In Information Technology (ITSim), 2010 International Symposium in (Vol. 1, pp. 1-6). IEEE.

[12]. Fernandez, A., Insfran, E., & Abrahão, S. (2011). Usability evaluation methods for the web: A systematic mapping study. Information and Software Technology, 53(8), 789-817.

[13]. Galovicova, T., Kremenova, I., & Fabus, J. (2016). Usability Evaluation of University Websites. Retrieved from http://www.eunis.org/eunis2017/wpcontent/uploads/site/ 10/2017/06/EUNIS_2017_paper_10.pdf.

[14]. International Organization for Standardization. (1998). Ergonomic Requirements for office work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs)-Pt. 11: Guidance on Usability (ISO 9241-11).

[15]. Internet World Stats, (2017). Internet World Stats Usage and Population Statistics. Retrieved from: http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats1.htm#links.

[16]. Ismailova, R., & Kimsanova, G. (2017). Universities of the Kyrgyz Republic on the Web: Accessibility and usability. Universal Access in the Information Society, 16(4), 1017-1025.

[17]. Joo, S., Lin, S., & Lu, K. (2011). A usability evaluation model for academic library websites: Eefficiency, effectiveness and learnability. Journal of Library and Information Studies, 9(2), 11-26.

[18]. Kabir, G., & Akhtar Hasin, M. A. (2013). Multi-criteria inventory classification through integration of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and Artificial Neural Network. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 14(1), 74-103.

[19]. Lakshmanpriya, C., Sangeetha, N., & Lavanpriya, C. (2013). Vendor selection in manufacturing industry using AHP and ANN. The SIJ Transactions on Industrial, Financial & Business Management, 1(1), 29-34.

[20]. Manzoor, M., & Hussain, W. (2012). A web usability evaluation model for higher education providing Universities of Asia. Science, Technology and Development.

[21]. Manzoor, M., Hussain, W., Ahmed, A., & Iqbal, M. J. (2012). The importance of higher education website and its usability. International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 1(2), 150-163.

[22]. Mentes, S. A., & Turan, A. H. (2012). Assessing the usability of university websites: An empirical study on Namik Kemal University. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 11(3), 61-69.

[23]. Mvungi, J., & Tossy, T. (2015). Usability evaluation methods and principles for the web. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security, 4(7), 165- 171.

[24]. Nagpal, R., Mehrotra, D., & Bhatia, P. K. (2016). Usability evaluation of website using combined weighted method: Fuzzy AHP and entropy approach. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 7(4), 408-417.

[25]. Nagpal, R., Mehrotra, D., & Bhatia, P. K. (2017). The state of art in website usability evaluation methods. In Design Solutions for User-Centric Information Systems (pp. 275-296). IGI Global.

[26]. Nagpal, R., Mehrotra, D., Bhatia, P. K., & Bhatia, A. (2015a). FAHP approach to rank educational websites on usability. International Journal of Computing and Digital Systems, 4(04), 251-260.

[27]. Nagpal, R., Mehrotra, D., Bhatia, P. K., & Sharma, A. (2015b). Rank university websites using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS approach on usability. International Journal of Information Engineering and Electronic Business, 7(1), 29- 36.

[28]. Nielsen, J. (1999). Designing Web Usability: The Practice of Simplicity. New Riders Publishing.

[29]. Oztekin, A., Delen, D., Turkyilmaz, A., & Zaim, S. (2013). A machine learning-based usability evaluation method for e-Learning systems. Decision Support Systems, 56, 63-73.

[30]. Paz, F., & Pow-Sang, J. A. (2014, December). Current trends in usability evaluation methods: A systematic review. In Advanced Software Engineering and Its Applications (ASEA), 2014 7^th International Conference on (pp. 11-15). IEEE.

[31]. Pearson, J. M., Pearson, A., & Green, D. (2007). Determining the importance of key criteria in web usability. Management Research News, 30(11), 816-828.

[32]. Ravankar, A., Ravankar, A. A., Kobayashi, Y., & Emaru, T. (2017, November). Optimal robot path selection using Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchical process. In Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute Proceedings (Vol. 2, No. 3, p. 111).

[33]. Rochimah, S. (2016). The improvement of software Quality Model for academic websites based on Multiperspective approach. Journal of Theoretical & Applied Information Technology, 86(3), 464-471.

[34]. Roy, S., & Pattnaik, P. K. (2014). Some popular usability evaluation techniques for websites. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Frontiers of Intelligent Computing: Theory and Applications (FICTA) 2013 (pp. 535-543). Springer, Cham.

[35]. Roy, S., Pattnaik, P. K., & Mall, R. (2017). Quality assurance of academic websites using usability testing: An experimental study with AHP. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 8(1), 1-11.

[36]. Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal Of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83-98.

[37]. Sadeghian, R., & Sadeghian, M. R. (2016). A decision support system based on artificial neural network and fuzzy analytic network process for selection of machine tools in a flexible manufacturing system. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 82(9-12), 1795-1803.

[38]. Sarsarabi, S. S., & Sarsarabi, A. H. (2015, June). Promoting University Website Based on Webometrics. In 1^st Global Conference On Technology In Language Learning (pp. 1-10).

[39]. Shackel, B. (1991). Usability - Context, Framework, Definition, Design and Evaluation. In B. Shackel and S. Richardson (Eds.), Human Factors for Informatics Usability (21-38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[40]. Sohrabi, B., Mahmoudian, P., & Raeesi, I. (2012). A framework for improving e-commerce websites usability using a hybrid genetic algorithm and neural network system. Neural Computing and Applications, 21(5), 1017-1029.

[41]. Speicher, M. (2015). What is usability? A characterization based on ISO 9241-11 and ISO/IEC 25010. arXiv preprint arXiv:1502.06792.

[42]. Srichetta, P., & Thurachon, W. (2012). Applying fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to evaluate and select product of notebook computers. International Journal of Modeling and Optimization, 2(2), 168-173.

[43]. Taha, Z., & Rostam, S. (2011). A fuzzy AHP-ANN-based decision support system for machine tool selection in a flexible manufacturing cell. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 57(5-8), 719.

[44]. Tripathi, P., Pandey, M., & Bharti, D. (2010, February). Towards the identification of usability metrics for academic web-sites. In Computer and Automation Engineering (ICCAE), 2010 The 2^nd International Conference on (Vol. 2, pp. 393-397). IEEE.

[45]. Wanke, P., Kalam Azad, M. A., Barros, C. P., & Hadi- Vencheh, A. (2016). Predicting performance in ASEAN banks: An integrated fuzzy MCDM–neural network approach. Expert Systems, 33(3), 213-229.

[46]. Yerlikaya, Z., & Durdu, P. O. (2017, July). Usability of university websites: A systematic review. In International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 277-287). Springer, Cham.

Integrated Usability Evaluation Framework for University Websites

Abstract

Keywords

How to Cite this Article?

References

If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Options for accessing this content:

	North Americas,UK, Middle East,Europe		India	Rest of world
	USD	EUR	INR	USD-ROW
Pdf	35	35	200	20
Online	35	35	200	15
Pdf & Online	35	35	400	25