Comparative Study on Methodology of Neo-Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis Over DSHA and PSHA

Pradeep Verma*, Sana Zafar**
* Department of Civil Engineering, MMM University of Technology, Gorakhpur, India.
** Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, MMM University of Technology, Gorakhpur, India.
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jste.6.4.13913

Abstract

Neo-Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis is an innovative method for seismic hazard analysis in India, based on realistic earthquake scenario. This paper shows a comparative study on methodology of neo-deterministic seismic hazard analysis over DSHA and PSHA. Deterministic seismic hazard analysis and Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis provides only peak ground acceleration, but Neo-deterministic seismic hazard analysis provides also other ground motion parameter like peak ground displacement and peak ground velocity that can play key role in developing seismic hazard maps. The objective of this research and use for seismic microzonation purposes were also discussed.

Keywords

Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis (DSHA), Neo-Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis (NDSHA), Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis, Peak Ground Acceleration.

How to Cite this Article?

Verma, P. and Zafar,S. (2018). Comparative Study on Methodology of Neo-Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis Over DSHA and PSHA. i-manager’s Journal on Structural Engineering, 6(4), 29-33. https://doi.org/10.26634/jste.6.4.13913

References

[1]. Aki, K. (1987). Strong motion seismology. In Strong Ground Motion Seismology (pp. 3-39). Springer Netherlands.
[2]. Biswas, S. K. (1987). Regional tectonic framework, structure and evolution of the western marginal basins of India. Tectonophysics, 135(4), 307-327.
[3]. Bus, Z., Szeidovitz, G., & Vaccari, F. (2000). Synthetic seismogram based deterministic seismic zoning for the Hungarian part of the Pannonian basin. In Seismic Hazard of the Circum-Pannonian Region (pp. 205-220). Birkhäuser Basel.
[4]. Indian Metrological Department. Publications of Earthquake.
[5]. Kramer, S. L. (1996). Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. Prentice Hall. New York.
[6]. Klügel, J. U., Mualchin, L., & Panza, G. F. (2006). A scenario-based procedure for seismic risk analysis. Engineering Geology, 88(1), 1-22.
[7]. McGuire, R. K. (2001). Deterministic vs. probabilistic earthquake hazards and risks. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 21(5), 377-384.
[8]. Nath, S. K. (2007). Seismic Microzonation Framework- Principles and Applications. In Microzonation Workshop (pp. 1-35). Interline Publishing.
[9]. Panza, G. F., Romanelli, F., & Vaccari, F. (2001). Seismic wave propagation in laterally heterogeneous anelastic media: theory and applications to seismic zonation. Advances in Geophysics, 43, 1-95.
[10]. Panza, G .F., Irikura, K., Kouteva, M., Peresan, A., Wang, Z., & Saragoni, R. (2011). Advanced Seismic Hazard Assessment in Pure Appl. Geophys., 168 (2011), 1-9.
[11]. Panza, G. F., & Romanelli, F. (2014). Seismic waves in 3-D: from mantle asymmetries to reliable seismic hazard assessment. Earthquake Science, 27(5), 567-576.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article
Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

USD EUR INR
Print 35 35 200
Online 35 35 200
Print & Online 35 35 400