https://doi.org/10.26634/jps.5.3.13666"> Efficiency and Investment Comparison of Monocrystalline, Polycrystalline, and Thin Film Solar Panel Types at Karabuk Conditions

Efficiency and Investment Comparison of Monocrystalline, Polycrystalline, and Thin Film Solar Panel Types at Karabuk Conditions

Mehmet ��zkaymak*, Abd�?lsamed Tabak**, Ahmet Canan***, Mehmet Volkan Aksay****, ��zg�?r Inan̤*****, ��mm�? G�?ls�?m Eruz******
* Professor, Department of Energy Systems Engineering, Karabük University, Karabük, Turkey.
**-***** Research Assistant, Department of Energy Systems Engineering, Karabük University, Karabük, Turkey.
****** Ph.D. Scholar, Department of Energy Systems Engineering, Karabük University, Karabük, Turkey.
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jps.5.3.13666

Abstract

Within the scope of this study, the efficiency of Monocrystalline, polycrystalline, and thin film photovoltaic panels have been experimentally investigated in Karabük conditions. In the frame of the research, the efficiencies of the panels have been compared by using the amount of incoming radiation, current, voltage, and the amount of power generated by the panel. When the datasheets of panels are viewed, efficiency comparison has seen as monocrystalline, polycrystalline, and thin film, respectively. According to the experiments made, while the efficiency of monocrystalline panel at 250 Watt varies between 12-16%; the efficiency of polycrystalline panel increase nearly 21% based on the amount of radiation; whereas it has been seen that, the efficiency of thin film couldn't exceed nearly 5%. During the measurements, if the air temperature is considered between 30-35 oC, the efficiency of thin film estimated will be low. In Turkey conditions, when the unit price of these panels is considered, using polycrystalline panel for the investments seems much more attractive. As the efficiencies of thin film are low, it has been the last one in comparison. When it is considered that, the investors especially hesitate between polycrystalline and monocrystalline panels, experimental results give a reasonable answer.

Keywords

Photovoltaic Panel Types, Monocrystalline Panel, Polycrystalline Panel, Efficiency Comparison, Cost Comparison

How to Cite this Article?

Özkaymak, M., Tabak, A., Canan, A., Aksay, M. V., Inanç, Ö., and Eruz, Ü. G. (2017). Efficiency and Investment Comparison of Monocrystalline, Polycrystalline, and Thin Film Solar Panel Types at Karabuk Conditions. i-manager’s Journal on Power Systems Engineering, 5(3), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.26634/jps.5.3.13666 https://doi.org/10.26634/jps.5.3.13666

References

[1]. Basoglu, M. E., Kazdaloglu A., Bilgin, M. Z., Erfidan, T., & Çakir, B. (2014). Performance Evaluation of Different Solar Panel Technologies for Kocaeli Province. Bursa: Elektrik-Elektronik-Bilgisayarve Biyomedikal Mühendisligi Sempozyumu, 27-29 Kasim.
[2]. Cohen, M.L., & Chelikowsky, J.R. (1988). Electronic Structure and Optical Properties of Semiconductors. Vol.75. Gewerbestrasse: Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences.
[3]. Directorate General of Renewable Energy. (2016 May 22). Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources. Retrieved from http://www.eie.gov.tr/yenilenebilir/g_enj_tekno.aspx
[4]. Erkul, A. (2010). Monokristal, PolikristalveAmorf- Silisyum Gunes Panelleri VerimliligininIncelenmesive Aydinlatma Sistemi Uygulamasi. GaziUniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitusu YuksekLisans Tezi.
[5]. Luque, A., & Hegedus, S. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of photovoltaic Science and Engineering. John Wiley & Sons.
[6]. Möller, H. J., Funke, C., Rinio, M., & Scholz, S. (2005). Multicrystalline silicon for solar cells. Thin Solid Films, 487(1), 179-187.
[7].Oguz, Y., Karaka n, A., Uslu , B. ( 2015 ). Afyonkarahisar’ da Kurulu Olan Monokristal, PolikristalveInce Film Günes Panellerinin VerimliligininIncelenmesi, TesisatMühendisligi, Sayi 149.
[8]. Prasad, D. K., & Snow, M. (2005). Designing with Solar Power, A Source Book for Building Integrated Photovoltaics (BIPV). Australia: Images Publishing.
[9]. Roberts, S., & Guariento, N. (2009). Building Integrated Photovoltaics: A Handbook. Berlin Germany: Birkhauser Press.
[10]. Tabak, A., & Endiz, M. S. (2016). The Comparative Analyzes of Solar Energy Production Potential between Van and Antalya Using PVSOL Simulation Tool. i-manager's Journal on Instrumentation & Control Engineering, 4(3), 1- 6.
[11]. Thomas, R., & Fordham, M. (2001). Photovoltaics and Architecture. London and Newyork: Spon Press.
[12]. Upadhyaya, A.,Yelundur V., & Rohatg. A. (2006). High Efficiency Mono-Crystalline Solar Cells with Simple Manufacturable Technology. Gerorgia Institute of Technology.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article
Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

USD EUR INR
Print 35 35 200
Online 35 35 200
Print & Online 35 35 400