Nuancing: Fidelity and Flexible Adaptivity in the Implementation of Technology-Rich Innovations

Michael K. Thomas*
Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Psychology, University of Illinois, Chicago, USA.
Periodicity:April - June'2017
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.14.1.13584

Abstract

This manuscript reports on two studies on the implementation of a technology-rich innovation in public schools. This technology-rich innovation was an online quasi-video game environment that used 'through-the-window' virtual reality and a robust back story to situate learning activities in the virtual world for children. The first study examined the reasons why teachers chose to implement the innovation as well as the core challenges and supports necessary for the successful implementation of the innovation. This study used case study methodology and found that the innovation required a great degree of alignment between project goals and existing teacher needs and concerns. The second study re-examined data from the first study to explore how the innovation was actually implemented. The second study employed classic grounded theory methods for analysis and theory building. Nuancing theory emerged as the core category that arose as a result of the inductive grounded theory analysis procedures. This paper elaborates nuancing theory and addresses its possible applications to the problem of designing, developing, and implementing technologyrich innovations for situating learning activity in schools.

Keywords

Education, Educational Technology, Technology, Implementation, Design, Grounded Theory.

How to Cite this Article?

Thomas,M. K. (2017). Nuancing: Fidelity and Flexible Adaptivity in the Implementation of Technology-Rich Innovations. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 14(1), 20-34. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.14.1.13584

References

[1]. Amiel, T. & Reeves, T. C. (2008). Design-based research and educational technology: Rethinking technology and the research agenda. Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 29-40.
[2]. Anderson, T. & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16-25.
[3]. Anthony, C. Hilliker-Vanstrander, S., Meskill, C., Tseng, C.H., & You, J. (2006). CALL: A survey of K-12 ESOL teacher uses and preferences. TESOL Quarterly, 40(2), 439-451.
[4]. Armstrong, A. & Casement, C. (2000). The child and the machine: How computers put our children's education at risk. Beltsville, MD: Robins Lane Press.
[5]. Barab, S. A. & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1-14.
[6]. Barab, S. & Luehmann, A. (2003). Building sustainable science curriculum: Acknowledging and accommodating local adaptation. Science Education, 87(4), 454-467.
[7]. Barab, S., Thomas, M., Dodge, T., Newell, M., & Squire, K. (2004). Critical design ethnography: Designing for change. Anthropology in Education, 35(2), 254-268.
[8]. Bauer, J. & Kenton, J. (2005). Toward technology integration in the schools: Why it isn't happening. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(4), 519-546.
[9]. Berman, P. & McLaughlin, M. W. (1974). A model of educational change. (No. R-1589/1-HEW). Federal Programs Supporting Educational Change, Vol. I, Santa Monica, CA: RAND
[10]. Berman, P. & McLaughlin, M. W. (1975). The findings in review. (No. R-1589/4-HEW). Federal Programs Supporting Educational Change, Vol. IV, Santa Monica, CA: RAND
[11]. Berman, P. & McLaughlin, M. W. (1978). Implementing and sustaining innovations. Federal Programs Supporting Educational Change, Vol. VIII, (No. R-1589/8-HEW). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
[12]. Berman, P., Greenwood, P. W., McLaughlin, M. W., & Pincus, J. (1975). Executive summary. Supporting Educational Change, Vol. V, (No. R-1589/5-HEW). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
[13]. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2(2), 141-178.
[14]. Brown, A. L. & Campione, J. C. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles and systems. In L. Schauble and R. Glaser (Eds.), Innovations in Learning: New Environments for Education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[15]. Chickering, A. W. & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39(7), 3-7.
[16]. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A. A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.
[17]. Collins, A. (1992). Toward a design science of education. In E. Scanlon & T. O'Shea (Eds.), New Directions in Educational Technology, 15-22. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
[18]. Crandall, D. (1983). The teacher's role in school improvement. Educational Leadership, 41(3), 6-9.
[19]. Crandall, D. P., Loucks-Horsley, S., Baucher, J. E., Schmidt, W. B., Eiseman, J. W., Cox, P. L., et al., (1982). Peoples, Policies, and Practices: Examining the Chain of School improvement (Vol. 1–10). Andover, MA: The NETWORK.
[20]. Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and Machines: The Classroom Use of Technology Since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.
[21]. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and Underused: Computers in the Classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[22]. Christensen, R. (2002). Effects of technology integration education on the attitudes of teachers and students. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(4), 411–434.
[23]. Cunningham, D. L. (1985). Adoption of an innovation: Monitoring the concerns of vocational teachers. Journal of Vocational Education Research, 10(1), 15–28.
[24]. Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. New York: Oxford University Press.
[25]. Dede, C. (1998). The scaling-up process for technology-based educational innovations. In C. Dede (Ed.), ASCD Year Book 1998: Learning with Technology, 199-215. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
[26]. Elmore, R. F. (1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 1-26.
[27]. Erlandson, D. A., Harris, E. L., Skipper, B. L., & Allen, S. D. (1993). Doing Naturalistic Inquiry: A Guide to Methods. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
[28]. Fishman, B. (2014). Designing usable interventions: Bringing student perspectives to the table. Instructional Science, 42, 115-121.
[29]. Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network. Retrieved August 1, 2014, from http://cfs.cbcs.usf.edu/_docs/publications/NIRN_Monograph_Full.pdf.
[30]. Franklin, T., Turner, S., Kariuki, M., & Duran, M. (2001). Mentoring overcomes barriers to technology integration. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 18, 26-30.
[31]. Fullan, M. & Pomfret, A. (1977). Research on curriculum and instruction implementation. Curriculum and Instruction, 47, 335-397.
[32]. Fullan, M. (1982). The Meaning of Educational Change. New York: Teachers College Press
[33]. Gladwell, M. (2002). The Tipping Point: How Little Things can Make a Big Difference. Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Company.
[34]. Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory. Mill Valley, CA: The Sociology Press.
[35]. Glaser, B. G. (1998). Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
[36]. Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine Publication Company.
[37]. Gray, L., Thomas, N., & Lewis, L. (2010). Teachers' use of educational technology in U.S. public schools: 2009 (NCES 2010-040). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education: Washington, DC.
[38]. Greenwood, P. W., Mann, D., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1975). The process of change. Federal Programs Supporting Educational Change (Vol. III), (No. R-1589/3-HEW). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
[39]. Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5-12.
[40]. Hasselbring, T. S., Smith, L., Glaser, C. W., Barron, L., Risko, V. J., & Snyder, C. (2000). Literature Review: Technology to support Teacher Development. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
[41]. Hernandez, M., & Hodges, S. (2003). Building upon the theory of change for systems of care. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11(1), 19-26.
[42]. House, E. (1979). Technology versus craft: A ten year perspective on innovation. Curriculum Studies, 11, 1-15.
[43]. Hsu, S. (2010). The relationship between teacher's technology integration ability and usage. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43(3), 309-325.
[45]. Kim, S. H. & Thomas, M. K. (2015). A stage theory model of professional video game players in South Korea: The socio-cultural dimensions of the development of expertise. Asian Journal of Information Technology, 14(5), 176-186.
[46]. McLaughlin, M. W. (1990). The Rand change agent study revisited: Macro perspectives and micro realities. Educational Researcher, 19(9), 11-16.
[47]. McLellan, H. (1996). Virtual realities. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology. New York: Macmillan.
[48]. Miles, M. B., & Louis, K. S. (1990). Mustering the will and skill for change: The findings from a four-year study of high schools that are experiencing real improvement offer insights into successful change. Educational Leadership, 47, 57-61.
[49]. Murthy, S., Iyer, S., & Warriem, J. (2015). ET4ET: A Large- Scale Faculty Professional Development Program on Effective Integration of Educational Technology. Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 16–28.
[52]. Perrotta, C., & Evans, M. A. (2013). Orchestration, power, and educational technology: A response to Dillenbourg. Computers & Education, 69(1), 520-522.
[53]. Purcell, K., Heaps, A., Buchanan, J. & Friedrich, L. (2013). How teachers are using technology at home and in their classrooms. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved on August 1, 2014 from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Teachersand-technology
[54]. Randi, J. & Corno, L. (1997). Teachers as innovators. In B.J. Biddle, T.L. Good, & I.F. Goodson (Eds.), The International Handbook of Teachers and Teaching (Vol. II) (pp. 1163-1221). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
[55]. Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations, 4 Ed. New York: The Free Press.
[56]. Shelly, G. G., Cashman, R. E., & Gunter, G. A. (2002). Integrating Technology in the Classroom: Teachers Discovering Computers, 2nd Ed. Boston, MA: Course Technology, a division of Thomson Learning.
[59]. Squire, K., MaKinster, J., Barnett, M., Luehmann, A. L., & Barab S. A. (2003). Designed curriculum and local culture: Acknowledging the primacy of classroom culture. Science Education, 87(4), 468-489.
[60]. Thomas, M. K. (2004). The quest of Quest Atlantis: Developing a nuanced implementation of a technology rich educational innovation (Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University. Dissertation Abstracts International, 3162263).
[61]. Thomas, M. K., Ge, X., & Greene, B. (2011). Fostering 21st Century Skill Development by engaging Students in Authentic Game Design Projects in a High School Computer Programming Class. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(4), 383-400.
[62]. Thomas, M. K., Barab, S. A., & Tuzun, H. (2009). Developing Critical Implementations of Technology-Rich Innovations. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41(2), 125-154.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.